This current wording doesn't work (and obviously V's doesn't either - "dies" is not an instruction you can make a creature do). dude1818's wording is how an editor would put it.
I don't think it's terrible, but it's unintuitive. I just meant that you go from talking about "each creature" to "its controller," which doesn't make sense as written
also known as: Lord of the Cooking Pit.
added
to activation cost
name: Gem Mine >> Glowstone Mine
This current wording doesn't work (and obviously V's doesn't either - "dies" is not an instruction you can make a creature do). dude1818's wording is how an editor would put it.
Maybe swap the order around? "Each creature with power greater than normal deals the difference to its controller, then dies."
I don't think it's terrible, but it's unintuitive. I just meant that you go from talking about "each creature" to "its controller," which doesn't make sense as written
Is it bad this causes life loss even for creatures with indestructible?
Tense?
"For each creature destroyed this way, its controller..."
The change in tense is jarring
...
...
Published as mtgnexus Card of the Day 2019-09-23.
I was picturing a camel inflated like a balloon
Published as mtgnexus Card of the Day 2019-09-22.
Published as mtgnexus Card of the Day 2019-09-21.
Yeah, wraith really doesn't deserve to be a creature type. It could totally be absorbed into spirit or shade
I actually like this with ability counters:
> "..., put a menace counter on up to one target Swamp. It becomes a 3/3 black Wraith creature. It's still a land."


>> 


...
...