If I chose that alt-cost, then any colored deck could cast it at the same cmc as a deck that actually manages to produce two . Might as well change the hard cast to .
A green-white deck (or any two-colors) would be able to cast this for less than the colorless mana deck.
The big discount is explicitly supposed to be a reward for managing to produce ALL colors at once. You only get this much of a discount because it is "all or nothing".
It's part of the Bringer cycle, Vitenka. Why ruin that?
Well, my other suggesiton would be
:)
If I chose that alt-cost, then any colored deck could cast it at the same cmc as a deck that actually manages to produce two
. Might as well change the hard cast to 
.
A green-white deck (or any two-colors) would be able to cast this for less than the colorless mana deck.
The big discount is explicitly supposed to be a reward for managing to produce ALL colors at once. You only get this much of a discount because it is "all or nothing".
Heh. I'm tempted to suggest that the alt-cost should be
. SO I 'll do so. Maybe the alt-cost should be the alt-cost should be 
?
Published as mtgnexus Card of the Day 2019-09-19.
...
Neat! Fun new take on cumulative upkeep.
...
...
...
...
...
...
now uses keyword counters
now uses keyword counters
now uses keyword counters
See Sunscape Apprentice etc. and Degavolver etc.
See Stormscape Apprentice etc. and Cetavolver etc.
See Nightscape Apprentice etc. and Necravolver etc.
common >> uncommon
...
...
...
suppress incorrect reminder text