@Tahazzar: This set does not use active status. I think you have become confused by an undocumented feature of the site that applies apparently only to sets with 300+ cards: A tabbed visual spoiler with multiple sections.
The sections are in order: colorless, colors (white, blue, black, red, green), multicolor (gold), hybrid, land, scheme, plane.
Since I have only one card with the colorless frame in this set that's the only one you see (the visual spoiler always starts in the first section in the list). If I didn't have this card you would have wrongly assumed my set consists of only 35 active white cards.
You will notice my visual spoiler shows "Go to section" where your visual spoiler has independently toggled filters labeled as "Show frames".
While this is somewhat interesting and certainly powerful, it doesn't quite feel "Mythic" to me.
I think this can also be seen when compared to the other mythic Eldrazis printed so far.
Btw, why does this set have the "active" status enabled with only this card being active? I would rather scroll through a "Visual spoiler" than the "Cardlist".
I didn't think a high power level of the provided example would be an issue: You invest four mana &two cards to draw four and each other player also draws two, so effectively this is a four mana investment to have each player gain two cards raw card advantage and cycle your own hand.
I'm also taking into consideration this is the specific "optimal" setup where you have exactly one card more than each other player.
For reference: How much would an always available straight "Discard one: You draw four; everyone else draws two" cost?
It's a slightly confusing, slightly differently balanced Wheel of Fortune. There you wanted to be hellbent, but everyone else to be high; here it's the other way around.
Confusing; sure - but in a genre of weird red cards that have surprising utility. I like it, though yes, I'd like to see if it can't get tighter wording somehow. (And also fear testing might show it to be overpowered. It feels like this will often be "Discard 1, draw 4; everyone else draws 2")
Source
I wish I was certain enough about my intent for this card to know whether this works as intended... ^^
@Tahazzar: This set does not use active status. I think you have become confused by an undocumented feature of the site that applies apparently only to sets with 300+ cards: A tabbed visual spoiler with multiple sections.
The sections are in order: colorless, colors (white, blue, black, red, green), multicolor (gold), hybrid, land, scheme, plane.
Since I have only one card with the colorless frame in this set that's the only one you see (the visual spoiler always starts in the first section in the list). If I didn't have this card you would have wrongly assumed my set consists of only 35 active white cards.
You will notice my visual spoiler shows "Go to section" where your visual spoiler has independently toggled filters labeled as "Show frames".
Well derp
Um, this is a WAIL, not a WALL :)
Wall of the Void is not a "Wall"? So sad.
While this is somewhat interesting and certainly powerful, it doesn't quite feel "Mythic" to me.
I think this can also be seen when compared to the other mythic Eldrazis printed so far.
Btw, why does this set have the "active" status enabled with only this card being active? I would rather scroll through a "Visual spoiler" than the "Cardlist".
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
Complexity is an issue.
I didn't think a high power level of the provided example would be an issue: You invest four mana &two cards to draw four and each other player also draws two, so effectively this is a four mana investment to have each player gain two cards raw card advantage and cycle your own hand.
I'm also taking into consideration this is the specific "optimal" setup where you have exactly one card more than each other player.
For reference: How much would an always available straight "Discard one: You draw four; everyone else draws two" cost?
It's a slightly confusing, slightly differently balanced Wheel of Fortune. There you wanted to be hellbent, but everyone else to be high; here it's the other way around.
Confusing; sure - but in a genre of weird red cards that have surprising utility. I like it, though yes, I'd like to see if it can't get tighter wording somehow. (And also fear testing might show it to be overpowered. It feels like this will often be "Discard 1, draw 4; everyone else draws 2")
This especially is really annoying to comprehend and parse quickly. In any case, maybe some kind of Windfall variant would be better..?
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
Still not, btw.
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source