[Assorted] Card Repository: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity
Mechanics | Card Cycles | Related Cards | Tribes | Factions | Planeswalker Profiles | Color Combinations | Cardset Overview | Fragmented Permanents | Planeswalker's Guide | Three Changes | [Vision] Subtypes | Horde Notes | Assorted Notes | Checklist | Statistical Analysis | Retroactive Archetypes | Supplemental Card Type Cards vs Other Cards | On Color Combinations | Planeswalker Type Watch | Order of Mana Symbols | Attraction Notes | Alternate Visual Spoiler (White) | Alternate Visual Spoiler (Blue) | Alternate Visual Spoiler (Black) | Alternate Visual Spoiler (Red) | Alternate Visual Spoiler (Green) | Alternate Visual Spoiler (Colorless) | Alternate Visual Spoiler (Hybrid) | Alternate Visual Spoiler (Gold) | Alternate Visual Spoiler (Land) | Alternate Visual Spoiler (Token) | War of the Spark

CardName: Eye Spy Cost: U Type: Creature - Homunculus Pow/Tgh: 1/1 Rules Text: Each player plays with the top card of his or her library revealed. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: [Assorted] Card Repository Uncommon

Eye Spy
{u}
 
 U 
Creature – Homunculus
Each player plays with the top card of his or her library revealed.
1/1
Updated on 01 Dec 2017 by SecretInfiltrator

Code:

History: [-]

2017-11-29 20:17:23: SecretInfiltrator created and commented on the card Eye Spy

Strangely avoids the name conflict with Spy Eye.

While I don't think this is problematic as far as power levels go, I think it's fair to say that low mana cost cards that reveal most of the cards players play affect gameplay negatively. That surprise/unknown element is a big pull of the game for many players.

Yay! Digging up a years old card just to see the same joke be made in a set released after years of work. ^^

Would the problem be lessened if I made it rare and allowed only youself to spy (at any time)? I could also make it a one-shot on ETB but always feel that's underwhelming.

You mean a Lens of Clarity on a stick instead of Goblin Spy?

Sounds reasonable. To me it seems that Lens would suggest it could even be a common.

Only signed-in users are permitted to comment on this cardset. Would you like to sign in?