Code Geass: Recent Activity
Code Geass: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Introduction and General Invitation | Proxies for playtest | Design Challenge 2 | Colour-pair archetypes | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Code Geass: (Generated at 2025-06-22 16:20:48)
"create"
tokens don't usually include type "Human"
tokens don't usually include type "Human"
I'm considering making this green. The flavour fits either way, though the Black Knights in red are the best at making secret preparations. Ritual-style effects are more red than green, though the rainbow tugs this slightly more greenwards. Red has a lot more to do, though, while I'm somewhat searching for green things to do; this would also help the (Green-white archetype), especially if I drop this down to common now the hybrid free cycle are up at uncommon.
unpleasantly wordy, but a good candidate for the common blue Prepare card for now
uncommon
uncommon
uncommon
uncommon
uncommon. still unsure about instant/sorcery
Flavour text: "I want a revolution thiiiiiiiiis big" :)
WB deck: ((White-black archetype))
Gosh, the decadence cards definitely aren't as controlly as I'd remembered. Many of them only help if you're attacking. Or rather, the ones useful on defence are mostly rare... which actually feels an okay place for the limited archetype to be. There's a good helping of common/uncommon removal and control. I'm fine for even a "control" archetype to need to make significant use of the combat step in this set.
2W / 2 -> 1W / 2
"play"->"cast"
UR deck: ((Blue-red archetype))
Seriously needs me to design more red cards that aren't all about attacking.
power 1->0; was "As long as you control another creature, ~ has haste"
"create"
Much of the set isn't designed yet (I've not even made a skeleton yet), but I'm wanting to try out a few of the archetypes that I think I've got enough designs in place to get a vague idea how they feel.
RW deck: ((Red-white archetype))
de-keyword; "white and black" -> "white"
remove squad
squad is way too wordy: remove it