Infinite Potential Well: Recent Activity
| Infinite Potential Well: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Planets and Gravity | Merge Gates | Madness | Venture into the House |
Recent updates to Infinite Potential Well: (Generated at 2025-09-03 15:39:46)
Looks like this one doesn't work either
art
See Restless Wraith.
Yeah. I wanted to just make an Animate Dead bestow card, but realized that the targeting requirements didn't work. This is just a one-off
Desecrate doesn't seem like an ability you would want to keyword. It's always going to be so expensive being both bestow and Zombify at once.
The design space seems even more narrow than the "ten keywords in one block don't need much design space"-abilities from RTR-block had, too.
You can put it on any number of creature sizes/Aura effects, but the reanimation effect will be dominating the way this is used.
See Animating Slime. No idea the numbers on this one
Card contest: use bestow
Quite frankly, I wanted to make a card called Confishcate, without regards to other design rules. It's not a very printable card, but that's not the point
Vitenka: Given Switcheroo and In Bolas's Clutches, I think 5 mana is already pushing the power level
> I figured the issue with landwalk was the variance, but since you're a blue deck that donates it, that issue goes away. Now it's on you to build around it.
But its still an additional keyword mechanic to carry around with you. Depending on the context it might be alright e. g. a Commander card like Teferi's Protection could have a standalone keyword that appears on just this card in a set without being evergreen.
Unless otherwise stated (or implied by specific mechanics e. g. mentioning the planar die) I'm going to assume a context of "Standard release" and there reintroducing islandwalk would be the wrong move either way.
No matter the context though, you still have the option of straight "This creature can't be blocked." How is the build-around value there? Is it your intent to to reward splashing off of artifacts and nonbasic lands? If so, why? Even in the "okay" context of Commander 20XX that's just "acceptable/unnecessary", not "preferable/Impressive".
Love the development name. Truly great.
Power-wise islandwalk is fine; it's just... normally a kinda annoying slightly-fiddly variant on "unblockable". Here, it's actually kinda interesting. Can I play
without playing islands? Or do I just hold on to some unsummon? Or just say "Ah whatever" and only use it on things worse than 2 damage a turn and hope they don't run much equipment?
Could this be downcost to
? It hits any permanent, but the downside is potentially quite large.
I figured the issue with landwalk was the variance, but since you're a blue deck that donates it, that issue goes away. Now it's on you to build around it
This is a card that cares about what your opponent plays. Eww.
I'd suggest to just have an enchantment with
> Monocolored creatures you control get +1/+1 and vigilance.
and converted mana cost 2 in this spot, same name.
Better than Sign in Blood as a plankton card in multiplayer? Certainly a nice flavor - the flavor text itself though is generic and uninteresting.
I don't like to think about Feaster of Lies.
I prefer the colorful Fish token to the islanwalk Fish token. I hated islandwalk before R&D made it popular to hate islandawalk though. When in doubt just not put islandwalk on the token?
Inevitable flavor text suggestion: "Sorry I annexed your village. Here's some fish."
See Shady Dealings.
See Cost of Greed.
Whoops, good catch Vitenka.
I wasn't expecting that much life payment tracking in whatever set this appears in, and at least it's the sort of card that you know you need to be tracking from the beginning of the game. No "oops I forgot I had this card." The point was to punish shock/fetch lands in Modern
Only targets opponent's creature
> "Ok, I paid all my life; guess I'll have it all back now, just costs me a creature" abuse.
You mean Children of Korlis / Tainted Sigil?
Needs some wording changes to prevent the obvious "Ok, I paid all my life; guess I'll have it all back now, just costs me a creature" abuse.
Apart from that, and needing to track something we never bothered to track before; seems fine though. I wonder how many other interesting things could be made in a set where tracking that is now normal? And how many interesting life-costs can exist outside of black?
I'm aware
> "... amount of life its controller paid this game..."
Stinks of memory issues.
Card design challenge: cheap removal for modern/legacy that doesn't break limited
Hello there Dracoplasm! Still looking good after all these years, I see.
Lol
Art