Infinite Potential Well: Recent Activity
| Infinite Potential Well: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Planets and Gravity | Merge Gates | Madness | Venture into the House |
Recent updates to Infinite Potential Well: (Generated at 2026-10-22 14:34:36)
Oh, that's right. ( ? ) results in
.
Alternatively, I really like planeswalker hate like this, cognizant that it means something, but in a separate context from the rest of the game. I understand Link's annoyance. It is likely, though, that time will favor my opinion. It's really hard not to jump sharks in a game with 40 (?) designers/developers. If precedents are to be set, it's better to set it the right way, as opposed to the Despise way, where it's treated like any other card type.
I really don't like specific planeswalker hate like this, even though Wizards set the precedent with Despise.
Nice. Will normally work just like Cunning Wish, but just about enough differences to be worth existing. I do wonder if this should exile itself, but maybe wishing isn't as dangerous as they thought it was back in the day.
flavor text
If there's no legal targets, I think the triggered ability itself gets countered and no copy is made.
The problem here isn't "can't be countered"; if it somehow ended up making a copy of an uncounterable spell with no legal targets, the spell would resolve and do nothing to the illegal target. The problem is creating a copy of a spell without ensuring it has some legal target first.
aha! I knew there was somewhere that "Cannot be countered" made problems :)
Oh, of course. What about a random targeted spell when the opponent has shroud (Leyline of Sanctity, Witchbane Orb etc)?
My issue is that I think this is the only card that can potentially create copies of spells with no legal targets. You're creating a copy of Oona's Grace that can't target you and (if the opponent has shroud) can't target the opponent either. What happens to it? (Okay, in practice I guess the answer is "it gets countered on resolution"...)
Since you control the copy, it targets your opponent.
What's it meant to do on things that say "target opponent" like Appetite for Brains (assuming a standard 2-player duel)?
Ah. There's the sneaker hiding at the end. Well, you're right about that. I'll let you figure out which you prefer after that point.
If I said "different," would I still need to say "It can't target you"?