Multiverse Feedback
Multiverse Feedback by Alex
286 cards in Multiverse
177 with no rarity, 96 commons, 3 uncommons,
2 rares, 6 mythics, 2 basics
1 colourless green, 39 white, 57 blue, 2 black, 41 red,
99 green, 2 multicolour, 3 hybrid, 40 artifact, 2 land
1020 comments total
Report bugs and discuss ideas for new features here
| Multiverse Feedback: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Upcoming releases | Skeleton |
This is not a conventional set of cards. Instead this is where to track bugs and upcoming features in Multiverse.
If you want to report a bug or suggest a feature, click New card above!
You can use the colour/frame of the "card" to indicate what type of issue you're creating:
BLACK for security or privacy issues or other "evilness"
RED for bugs of any other kind
WHITE for user interface suggestions, making it easier to do things you already can do
BLUE for feature suggestions, allowing you to do things you can't already do- When an issue is completed, it'll become
GREEN. - If an issue is not a bug, is unreproducible, or a duplicate of another record, it will be marked as ARTIFACT.
Please comment on suggestions if they matter to you. If you see a proposal that you like, add a comment saying you want it. Alex is far more likely to add a feature if lots of people want it!
Cardset comments (11) | Add a comment on this cardset
The set creator would like to draw your attention to these comments:
|
On Version Control (reply):
on 19 Feb 2016
by
Alex:
Mmm. Yeah, this is a sensible topic to raise. Back when I was on a free database, I was confident I wouldn't have space for previous revisions. However now that I'm paying for the database, we've got a good amount of space, so storing previous revisions is a fairly plausible enhancement. It wouldn't be insanely difficult, but it would be a moderate amount of work; however it's a very sensible thing to ask for. No promises, but I'll look into it further. |
On Bugs importing from CSV (reply):
on 18 Jun 2015
by
Alex:
In theory I could directly import MSE files rather than making people have to export. I'm getting a bit more time in the evenings now than I was a couple of months ago so I could have a go at that myself. I've got a good sample MSE set I can be using. |
On Card history (reply):
on 25 Feb 2012
by
Alex:
Mmm. Yeah. For a long time this was a feature which I knew would be nice but I was imagining would never happen, because the database space required is at least an order of magnitude greater than for Multiverse's current implementation. In particular, this would make my database size expand past the limit of Heroku's free hosting plan. But that was quite a number of months ago. And, erm, the database is already four times the size that Heroku supposedly limit their free hosting plan to, and I haven't been charged or run up against any database size limits. So perhaps I could give this a try. It's possible it might precipitate the inevitable move to paid-for hosting, at which point I probably would stick up a Paypal Donate button somewhere on the site. And I quite like not being at that state yet. |
Recently active cards: (all recent activity)
imgur link: http://imgur.com/a/m3aCn
Right now I'm looking at http://www.magicmultiverse.net/cardsets and "Community mashup set" appears in the right place for chronological order, but the "recent activity" column doesn't show the most recent card creation+comment, rather the previous one.
Is this an existing caching issue, or something I'm imagining or something else?
Ah, bother, yes, there's a recent change I made that will have been the one to cause this. Thanks for pointing out the bug. I know how to fix it.
Huh. There was something very weird going on there.
The first thing I tried did fix it for that set, but sadly that meant I wasn't able to investigate why it had happened. It's probably some quirk of cacheing that could still happen in future, so I'll leave this open.
Fancy. I can see why this makes sense with multiple card faces.
Thanks for the help!
Fortunately it's not as bad as you think (and it's not really a bug).
The thing is, you've got the card's type set to "Planeswalker". Multiverse is respecting that.
If you edit that type to remove the word "Planeswalker" (just removing the final "r" is enough) then it reverts to the normal creature frame and you can edit the power (to remove it). Then you can restore the "Planeswalker" type if you want.
When trying to edit the card Torben the Crusader, I noticed that trying to change the frame from "planeswalker" back to "normal" is not possible - in fact any frame you choose afterwards will have now a face that's a planeswalker card.
Due to this the field "power" cannot be edited after creation of the card if you make the card a planeswalker.
Cardlist is known to not work. But Visual Spoiler should work, as that's paginated. I've used Visual Spoiler on the Multiverse Design Challenge set in the past... yes, that works fine, and that set has 3000 cards.
I agree that VS doesn't seem to be working for CWNH though. That's frustrating. I'll look into it.
Edit: Wow, it seems to be that anyone attempting to view the CWNH visual spoiler generals a "Memory quota vastly exceeded" error. Yikes.
While checking some sets for the behavior of Visual Bug in Visual Spoiler if stumbled upon another:
This visual spoiler page clearly shows frames of multiple colors, but for me the line "Show frames:" contines only a button for filtering black frames (the set prviously contained only a large number of black cards, so maybe the buttons just don't update correctly with new cards added?).
Force refresh does not resolve the issue.
link to image
Left: before applying filter Right: after applying filter
It seems the filter currently just hides card art.
Aye. The Cards With No Home set with 1600+ cards is a good example. It probably has a bunch of interesting cards, but currently it's impossible to view them properly. You are limited to scouring through the "Recent Activity" or whatever.
Maybe some kind of "partial view" with couple of hundred of cards per page could alleviate this issue?