Multiverse Feedback
Multiverse Feedback by Alex
225 cards in Multiverse
121 with no rarity, 95 commons, 3 uncommons,
2 rares, 4 mythics
29 white, 52 blue, 2 black, 31 red, 77 green,
1 multicolour, 3 hybrid, 28 artifact, 2 land
769 comments total
Report bugs and discuss ideas for new features here
| Multiverse Feedback: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Upcoming releases | Skeleton |
This is not a conventional set of cards. Instead this is where to track bugs and upcoming features in Multiverse.
If you want to report a bug or suggest a feature, click New card above!
You can use the colour/frame of the "card" to indicate what type of issue you're creating:
BLACK for security or privacy issues or other "evilness"
RED for bugs of any other kind
WHITE for user interface suggestions, making it easier to do things you already can do
BLUE for feature suggestions, allowing you to do things you can't already do- When an issue is completed, it'll become
GREEN. - If an issue is not a bug, is unreproducible, or a duplicate of another record, it will be marked as ARTIFACT.
Please comment on suggestions if they matter to you. If you see a proposal that you like, add a comment saying you want it. Alex is far more likely to add a feature if lots of people want it!
Cardset comments (10) | Add a comment on this cardset
Recently active cards: (all recent activity)
If the idea isn't too crazy, boosters with a number of cards different from 15 is cool, too.
I know it isn't what Hálian would prefer, but he/she could make two separate sets and duplicate a number of cards into those two sets. This wouldn't be a reasonable solution if Hálian was looking to make five different booster packs, each with their own focus... but it at least seems like a reasonable answer to the temporary problem at hand.
Though, this does raise the question of whether making a feature that duplicates cards is wise. I think we had another discussion on that somewhere, but I'm not sure.
Note to self: This issue will become a lot more urgent when Multidraft can do more than just generate boosters. I need at least to provide a way for Cube-style sets to specify that their default boosters should ignore rarity.
CH says "a set where booster is ["anything", "anything", ...], and each card has a field "slot": "anything" would cause Multidraft to give you a flat distro."
Yay, I found a bug and I never even realised!
I think @-tagging would be a useful feature.
Vitenka, I'm rolling my eyes at you.
I put forward my utter contempt hate and loathing of this suggestion. This isn't twitter, ffs!
Yeah, I've reached the same conclusion about (((/[[[ myself. Both halves of it. It was originally meant to nicely match the formatting that draw3cards.com uses, but that site has gone the way of the dodo. I agree, if I add tagging it'll be in the form of @username.
@-format as is used in stackexchange-type sites may be a better choice of formatting. I dislike the (((/[[[ formatting for links myself (I'd rather it be two for links and three for images but it's far too late to change that!).
Mmm, "backlink search", aka "what links here". Makes sense.
The way to do it would be to make it that when anyone creates or edits a comment linking to other cards, at that point I go and update the other cards' lists of "what links to me".
It is indeed possible to do this manually, by searching comments for the card name or the card number, but quite a bit more fiddly.
It would be nice to be able to mention someone whose attention you want to gain. If you implemented notifications, tagging users would be useful, like tagging people on Facebook.