Cards With No Home: Recent Activity
| Cards With No Home: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Other non-themed cardsets | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Cards With No Home: (Generated at 2025-05-01 09:20:41)
Had the idea floating in my head for a while. Seems potentially overpowered, or did when I first considered it without a cost to the ability.
LOL. Yeah, exactly.
SM: You're right, thanks. Although now it's too wordy (and it still doesn't say "shuffle your library").
I would say "X or less" here, since the times when your search target has an exact CMC match with a problem enchantment are rare enough that as-is, this is almost never worth entwining.
Green can do lands: Reap and Sow. But green also appears to be the Polymorph-a-land colour: Crop Rotation. Ah well.
It's like blue gets lots of jigsaw pieces that can be pieced together into removal, but they usually shy away from actually giving it explicit removal.
I will note that they combined your last suggestion there into one blue card in Spin into Myth.
Linking the rest of the family: Peculiar Infiltration, Peculiar Strength, Peculiar Winds, Peculiar Chantment, Peculiar Soulwrangling, Peculiar Putrefication, Peculiar Manhandling, Peculiar Righteousness, Peculiar Ultimatum, Peculiar Savagery, Peculiar Annihilation, Peculiar Mindsifting, Peculiar Barrenness, Peculiar Meekness, Peculiar Blinking, Peculiar Aping, and more and more...
Heh. There's potential for a card in the Peculiar Distortion family costing
, going something like "The next time damage would be dealt to target creature this turn, destroy it instead. ~ deals 1 damage to that creature." :)
Yeah, I decided to create the card, but I'm not sure if I should perpetuate false memes even in fantasy, or not.
Hmm, the ability to attack isn't an ability. That should probably be rationalised sometime.
Heh. If all your friends overpopulated then committed mass extinction by leaping off a cliff, would you do it too?
Is it right to mention here that lemmings jumping off a cliff is a rumor invented by Disney Filmmakers? I always get confused with rumors that everyone wants to believe is true, but isn't supported by a shred of evidence. You know, like J. Edgar Hoover crossdressing or the water in the toilet running counter-clockwise in Australia.
This was inspired by the hybrid mana design Challenge # 027. I was originally looking at color combinations that could do "destroy target creature", and I was considering that GR could possibly justify it if G gave deathtouch or 1/1 and R gave damage, and that led to other possible overlaps between B and R being "must attack".
Then I remembered that U and G had had alluring siren (only when it made sense in flavour) and provoke / prized unicorn and wondered if I could do it in
. But then I decided the flavour was sufficiently compelling it should be made as is, and it wanted to be GU or G. Neither G nor U normally gets "attacks if able", but I thought it was right for the card :)
Hm. I like the idea, although I fear it may be too good if you get to choose the creature. Feel free to edit it, if you like, I probably won't try to improve it.
Good idea! The flavor doesn't come through, though. Why not gain control of them, then sacrifice them? That is what the flavor is telling you to do, right?
I doubt this is printable, but it's what popped into my head while looking at cards like (((Leige of the Pit))) and (((Lord of the Pit))) and Archdemon of so-and-so. Why should the owner have to pay all the demonic costs, what's wrong with stealing them from the victim? (Assuming there's still a significant change you'll default :))
p/t -> 6/6
Reminds me of the YUMD decks (Yucky Blue Mana Denial), using Hoodwink and Boomerang to achieve just that.
Could one print this? Yes. Should one? No way.