Community Mashup Set: Recent Activity
| Community Mashup Set: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Recent updates to Community Mashup Set: (Generated at 2025-09-18 15:48:50)
| Community Mashup Set: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Recent updates to Community Mashup Set: (Generated at 2025-09-18 15:48:50)
Scienthia, Soul of Knowledge + Gearshift Ace
Huh. A dwarf who has changed gears 20 times in a single war :)
Anyway, firstrike crew; and everyone draws an extra card a turn, but you draw 3. In the end step, so that you do get an advantage before others do.
Draw cards on crew? Oh! Flip that around!
Huh. I intend this to be "fully crew", is that a term? Does this imply it's just contributing 1 crew (without tapping) for
?
Mangrove Scavenger + Spitting Slug
Gosh. It's a terrible card from the dark. Is that adjective redundant? Very nearly. Aaanyway, it's a 2/4 slug that either has first or last strike, depending on whether you (over)paid that turn. And a 1/1 deathtouch frog, that can put (set mechanic) counters onto stuff when it dies. Said set mechanic appears to basically be energy counters, but per-thing rather than pooled.
So toggle-deathtouch? And whatever anti-deathtouch is called; other than "Having 1 toughness"?
Half-slug, half-frog? ... huh. there really weren't as many of the augmentable creatures as it seemed. That explains why augment wasn't fun to play.
Wow, I really can't think of anything good to do with this. Toggleable death-frog it is.
Doh! Yes; should have been owner, not controller. The aim, as breifly described in the first comment; is that you zap an opponents creature with it. They then have to give up on it, or take the pain and unsummon it.
Oh drat it. Yes; it should be owner, not controller.
So the person doing the choosing is going to put the creature into their hand as well? Even if it's mind controlled from an opponent?
Considering this is a modal spell the person doing the choosing does so as the spell is announced rather than during resolution, right? So the creature changing control between casting and resolving the spell needs to be considered as well.
The person doing the choosing; but lets make it explicit
oops; add a somewhat important 'they'
Who loses the life?
I like the pun (and the card) :)
Using * for bullets gives you italics instead. Because of course it does. Markdown fail.
Evard's Spiked Tentacles + Into the Roil
Unsummon costing one extra; or 3 extra to also cantrip. And paralyse a crerature and also slowly kill it with -1 counters and also harm its controller and wow, this enchantment is a box of spanners.
Hmmm. Ok, maybe replace paralyse with unsummon? And make it a choice between killing it off and the damage?
Ok, I have the imagery of a mage trying to force a hippo back into their head. Let's do that. Pun for the name; fail to find art on a quick image search, and done.
art url too long; trying tinyurl
Ticking Gnomes + Obsidian Hulk
So a 6/3 vanilla. As a red common? That's extremely unusual.
And a 3/3 echo one-shot ping.
Well, I've got toughness 3. From toothychat, we're talking about hydra. So hydra it is.
And now it all comes together. Echo becomes paying for heads; heads dying becomes a ping.
Mmm, that's not all that vanilla anymore. And it kinda clockworky which is odd. Ok; howabout it's a build-up go boom kind of thing instead? More echoey at least.
Ugh, and now it really really wants to come into play with at least one counter so it always gets to do SOMETHING. And now it's just words words words. "Each hydra head eats a word from target card".
Ugh. Doom bucket
Flailing Tormentor + Manglehorn
2/1 unblockable, unsummon, scry. And 
2/2 destroy an artifact, kismet future artifacts.
Well, that's a bucket'o'abilities.
I think we can do something here.
That kind of replacement is hard to do in the middle of a spell's resolution. I think I'd probably change it to
"Prevent all damage that spells would deal to creatures you control. Any player may pay
to suppress this effect until end of turn."
And yeah, I thought I'd been seeing quite a few application error log emails recently. I don't know why it's happening - sorry :(
This is worded weird. Makes it sound like a one time payment or something...
Maybe "Creatures you control cannot be dealt damage by spells your opponent's control, unless that player pays
for each spell targeting a creature you control"?
Rhystic Lightning + Application Error.... that's happenning a lot recently. Try again. + Archetype of Courage
Wow. That's an interesting-but-poor lightning bolt variant. And a knight that gives your everything first strike with a rider of "No, we mean it; theirs don't and yours do" and with a slightly odd interaction if both of you get one (no one has first strike).
So some kind of first-strike-tax? Or "I can bolt you you can't bolt me"?
I guess a direct-damage hoser is the most plausible of those options. Kinda meh though.
Rot Hulk + 2777th card ever
Uhh... no. Try again. Unwelcome Counsel
Huh. "Game night" is a thing? Ah, starter set of five pre-con decks in a... really hard to store box. So close and yet so far from a good idea.
Ok, so a big mythic zombie-reanimator. And a fairly generic sorcery. "Draw two cards. You lose 2 life. Scry 1."
So obviously a black card. Some kind of card-lord?
Sure. Why not. I've got the perfect flavour for one.
"Whenever ~ becomes blocked by a creature, switch the power and toughness of the blocking creature."
Hmm, hard to find a wording making it clear that it's the creature blocking it that gets switched; rather than the pleasingly pointless 2/2 becoming a 2/2.
I guess making it both would be sufficiently clear?
typo
Viashino Weaponsmith + Rabid Wolf
A 2/2 lizard that's a 4/4 if you block it. And a 2/2 puppy with wither.
So I guess I'm making a 2/2 with some kind of combat upside. And I just had a "Well that would be stupid" idea, and then this came to me, so I'm doing it. This is a treefolk ability I think?
( -> *
Excommunicate + Deleting comments.
Um; let's try that again. +Battle-ready Squire
So two cards that cost
. One zaps a creature back to deck; the other is a vanilla unless you already lost a white card, in which case it's vigilant and lifelinked.
Huh. There's a mechanic there. I don't think it's a good mechanic though; since it encourages mono-colour. So we'll flip it around. Which also has the advantage that it'll work on land, so even a monodeck gets soem advantage from it.
Maybe
would have been more sensible, given the colour I made this. (I made it black for the life loss)
Actually; maybe 'doom' should further differentiate itself from cumulative upkeep by incrementing on each player's end phase?
Change to 4 life or 2 blue mana, cumulative
Well yeah; triangular life starting at 1 probably isn't enough to matter.
The "Anyone can use this" thing is much more of a problem. I wonder. Maybe "Pay a LOT of life, or offset it with blue mana" maybe? Culmulative upkeep of
? Yeah; let's do that. Though it's probably still "Use this in every deck" even at 4/8/12.
What downside? This is a 0 mana counter spell with no other relevant text. Every deck runs at least one copy, because it's also a complete color pie break