Tesla Project: Recent Activity

Mechanics | Skeleton | Storyline | Limited Archetypes | Creature Types

Recent updates to Tesla Project: (Generated at 2025-05-10 22:21:44)

2016-09-08 15:01:23: Jay Treat created the card Consulate Emergency
2016-09-08 14:54:20: Jay Treat edited Garuda Formation Leader
2016-09-08 14:52:54: Jay Treat created and commented on the card Garuda Formation Leader

3W?
2016-09-08 14:33:12: Jay Treat commented on Co-creation Marvel

Not sure most players know this can't make infinite thopters.
2016-09-08 14:29:44: Jay Treat commented on Royal Topiary

I am proposing a cycle.
2016-09-08 03:42:39: CasualR commented on Resentful District

There is one in Siv's Legacy
2016-09-08 03:42:09: CasualR commented on Royal Topiary

There could be. We have non-revolutionary transformers. Transforming lands are cool.
2016-09-08 01:48:30: Doombringer created the card Co-creation Marvel
2016-09-08 01:45:59: continuumg commented on Resentful District

I thought we wanted a rare revolution inciting card
2016-09-08 01:44:35: continuumg commented on Royal Topiary

Why GW?

Is there going to be a rare ally land cycle?
2016-09-08 01:23:37: Doombringer edited Citizen
2016-09-08 01:23:19: Doombringer created the card Citizen
2016-09-08 01:22:11: Doombringer created and commented on the card Thopter

The thopter we all know and love.
2016-09-07 23:22:44: Doombringer edited Resentful District:
removing from skeleton (for real this time)
2016-09-07 23:22:28: Doombringer commented on Resentful District

Yeh this was supposed to be removed from the skeleton, though suggestions for a different 3rd ability would be great.
2016-09-07 20:20:58: CasualR commented on Royal Topiary

I think it should become a land creature AND remain a DFC. It represents a significant permanent change that can't be as effectively communicated through a counter in my opinion.
2016-09-07 20:13:18: Jay Treat edited Royal Topiary
2016-09-07 20:12:46: Jay Treat commented on Royal Topiary

It doesn't remain a land. Should it? If so, maybe it shouldn't be a DFC.
2016-09-07 20:11:54: Jay Treat commented on Royal Topiary

'Untap' is what I meant. With two canisters, you can tap this for G, untap it, tap it for W, untap it, trigger it, then activate its ability and attack for 5.

In most sets, 'tap' would be the better trigger, but since canisters are all about untapping, why disguise its purpose?
2016-09-07 19:43:48: CasualR commented on Dumbo

This card looks insane. It also really encourages a stalling game unless of course you do have the canisters, then it becomes bonkers crazy good.
2016-09-07 19:42:10: CasualR commented on Royal Topiary

Tap versus untap are not actually very different. In fact, three untaps is actually slightly easier since you untap at the beginning of your turn. But it's not meaningfully different since it is a land, which tends to tap.
2016-09-07 19:39:58: CasualR edited Royal Topiary:
Front side color ordering
2016-09-07 19:39:25: CasualR commented on Royal Topiary

Care to add "It's still a land"?
2016-09-07 18:36:54: Jackal edited Royal Topiary:
"third time you untap" -> tap I'm guess that is what you meant.
2016-09-07 17:01:54: Jay Treat created the card Royal Topiary
2016-09-07 16:52:18: Jay Treat commented on Resentful District

Based on recent comments, it sounds like we don't want this third ability.
2016-09-07 16:41:41: Jay Treat created the card Dumbo
2016-09-07 16:37:53: Jay Treat commented on Capture and Coerce

There needs to be an intentional connection between the two abilities. Either ditch one, or connect them, so the card makes sense to readers.
2016-09-07 10:50:13: CasualR commented on Consulate Spy

Probably :P It probably wants to be a 1/4 or 0/5
2016-09-07 06:23:54: Doombringer commented on Consulate Spy

Would this be amazing as a 2/3?