Melody: Recent Activity
| Melody: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton | White Commons | Blue Commons | Black Commons | Red Commons | Green Commons | Multicolor Commons | Artifact Commons |
Recent updates to Melody: (Generated at 2026-01-30 17:06:47)
Removed the melody business and regeneration gobbledegook, now it's just like a wordier, monowhite version of Fight to the Death.
Yeah, I was obviously working from the Chainer template, but I was also just trying to come up with a really cool way to represent immortality within the game, albeit a finite sort of immortality.
If it weren't for the fact that "Lich" isn't a supported creature type, this would definitely be a "Lich" instead of "Spirit Wizard", but I just don't think "Zombie Wizard" is appropriate for something that changes form like this.
Hee, I think I missed this after the change in July. It's awesome, anyway. Reminds me a little of Chainer, Dementia Master. That and Diabolic Servitude.
Complete makeover after designing Hymnal Horror!
Hopefully this is an interesting black twist on Aura Gnarlid and the like.
"Bad rares, bad rares, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when I design you?"
I think that in a perfectly obedient world, this would cost
and no one would blink an eye. I don't think there's much in the way of unfair potential for this effect, as you can't duplicate another player's creature, and the double-white cost puts some amount of burden that your deck be base-white to cast this. So you're probably just countering a removal spell and getting a 2/3 for the low, low cost of 
.
@ Alex - Yes, I just could decided whether it was necessary to have the second "more". It felt like something that could be excised without disrupting interpretation, but apparently not. Has any card ever used "at least"? A-ha! Avatar of Might shows the way!
[Comment redacted, since I'm probably wrong]
Is that meant as "three or more creatures more than each opponent"?
Compare with Cackling Counterpart, which is just 3 mana and that's got flashback. Even counting this as Momentary Blink + Cackling Counterpart, I think 6 mana is plenty; might even be okay at 5. (Note that you really don't want to use this on an opponent's creature because they get the token; I guess you can use it as an odd Otherworldly Journey to fog an attacker for a turn.)
I do love the flavour, which I understood before you explained it.
Hmm. I'm just trying to figure out, without the delve, if this was too cheap with the casting cost of
. Combat trick cloning is pretty good. That plus a potential flicker trigger, and an answer to Blatant Thievery and Pacifism... hmm... probably fair. But color shifted to white and a delve option? That's got to jump the card to 7, IMO.
Definitely a bit of blue. I was aiming for the idea that sometimes when a creature gets flickered, it results in a split timeline that results in a copy of that creature. Or however you want to think of that sci-fi/dimensional concept.
I like the versatility of this, though I have to admit, it feels like it has a little blue in it.
Not sure if the cost-reduction clause is phrased properly, but hopefully it's understandable for the time being.