Link's Unplaced Cards: Recent Activity
| Link's Unplaced Cards: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics |
Recent updates to Link's Unplaced Cards: (Generated at 2026-06-15 15:29:36)
| Link's Unplaced Cards: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics |
Recent updates to Link's Unplaced Cards: (Generated at 2026-06-15 15:29:36)
Oh... You're right. Hmm. That's unfortunate.
This is almost strictly worse than Ancient Ziggurat; there can't be many decks that run more planeswalkers than nonlegendary creatures, especially not in the menagerie of colors that would lead you to a card like this for fixing. Even just for balance, the minor boost of an unconditional
is easy to justify.
http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?text=+[any]+[color]+[spend]&type=+[Land]
Hm. I'd agree with you, but it seems some any color lands tap for 1 and some don't - I don't know if it's for flavour or balance
Nice. Feels like it'd still be okay if it could also tap for
.
Gleep! Initially looks awesome. But it's actually a horrible denial engine. If you're manascrewed and discarding, suddenly you have no prospect of drawing any land again. More evilly, if I can bounce your lands that becomes equivalent to putting them on top of your deck.
Added Cleric subtype.
I hate when I accidentally press "go" on my Kindle while trying to backspace, resulting in an incomplete card.