Link's Unplaced Cards: Recent Activity

Link's Unplaced Cards: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

Mechanics

Recent updates to Link's Unplaced Cards: (Generated at 2026-06-15 15:29:37)

• 2013-08-09 08:21:42: Alex commented on Blazing Seer

  Nice. A fun and very red exploration of the new form of red card advantage pioneered by Chandra, Pyromaster.

• 2013-08-09 03:36:06: Link created the card Blazing Seer
• 2013-08-09 03:34:35: Link edited Grove of Growth
• 2013-08-09 03:34:17: Link edited Grove of Growth
• 2013-08-09 03:33:55: Link edited Divine Intervention
• 2013-08-09 03:27:48: Link created the card Divine Intervention
• 2013-08-09 03:21:05: Link created the card Therian Reaches
• 2013-08-09 03:17:37: Link created the card Siphoned Souls
• 2013-08-09 03:15:12: Link edited Grove of Growth
• 2013-08-09 03:14:10: Link commented on Floating Islands

  Just Commander? I was worried about power level overall.

• 2013-08-09 03:12:45: Link commented on Thornbush Elemental

  But Green gets good creatures!
  You're probably right. This needs to either cost more or be wimpier.

• 2013-08-05 15:22:41: Alex commented on Floating Islands

  Hee. Very nice indeed. Compulsion on a land that fits in all decks.

  Probably becomes an instant staple in close to every Commander deck.

• 2013-08-05 15:21:51: Alex commented on Thornbush Elemental

  Yowch. It works as whichever you need out of a really strong wall and a really strong trampler. Might need to be a bit pricier for that flexibility. Compare Wall of Torches (can't attack) or Garruk's Companion (can't regenerate).

• 2013-08-05 15:20:25: Alex commented on Vivid Rejection

  Amusingly, amuseum created Lock // Load just 4 months ago.

  Also, I thought there was a Bramblecrush variant in RoE that did this. There obviously wasn't, but you can see why they might print one. (And also why they didn't: the whole point in the removal in RoE was that most of it didn't work on Eldrazi.)

  I think the pie problems would be for colourless creatures rather than colourless enchantments or planeswalkers. Even so, I think this is fine.

  The set that'd want it rather than Demolish would be quite unusual though. There'd want to be quite a few colourless creatures that were small (rather than the gigantic Eldrazi).

• 2013-08-05 15:14:57: Alex commented on Grove of Growth

  Guuhh. That is a weird card. Needs the "(: Add to your mana pool.)" reminder text.

  So it encourages you to untap it, either using another one of it or something else, by handing out free Nature's Spirals if you do.

  Wacky. Johnny would certainly enjoy trying to break it though. Seems like it'd lend itself to some evil (fragile multi-part) locks.

• 2013-08-04 20:05:50: Link edited Grove of Growth
• 2013-08-04 20:05:04: Link created the card Grove of Growth
• 2013-08-04 15:24:34: Link created the card Floating Islands
• 2013-08-03 22:36:28: Link created the card Thornbush Elemental
• 2013-08-01 00:46:15: jmgariepy commented on Vivid Rejection

  Cards like this make we want to do really stupid things. Like play 4x Ghostly Flame...

  Edit: What? Ghostly Flame just makes the damage colorless, not the card? Weird...

• 2013-07-31 16:44:01: Jack V commented on Vivid Rejection

  Hm. Good point this could be green. I think Vorthos says it's green -- green's always had a much bigger "bring in line with nature" urge. But Melvin says it's red -- green can destroy artefacts and lands, but there's no particular reason for that rather than any other combination of non-creature permanents.

  I don't think it's unbalancing because, as you say, it will affect almost no cards :) But think wizards avoid breaking the pie whether it's for balance reasons or not -- Maro hated Hornet Sting even though it was weak.

• 2013-07-31 16:17:32: Vitenka commented on Vivid Rejection

  Planeswalkers too, I guess, but red's always been allowed to shoot those in the face.

  I'm kinda surprised we didn't see something like this in the set after Eldrazi, actually. Would have been a good way to bring them back under control.

• 2013-07-31 16:03:57: Link commented on Vivid Rejection

  I don't think this is really going to break the pie that often. I mean, how many colorless enchantments are there? That's really the only thing red shouldn't he allowed to destroy.

• 2013-07-30 23:19:12: jmgariepy commented on Vivid Rejection

  I've seen people give green this ability, for similar reasons. It seems more appropos there, imho, off the premise that green 'likes color'. But red seems to work, too. I suppose you could always paint it as "Red being insulted by a lack of passion".

  Also, stop trying to make Moonlace relevant. :)

• 2013-07-30 22:25:32: Jack V commented on Vivid Rejection

  Lol. Yeah, that's perfect. I don't THINK it would be printed for pie reasons, but I'm not sure.

• 2013-07-30 17:33:24: Link created the card Vivid Rejection
• 2013-07-29 08:18:30: Vitenka commented on Sifting Sands

  Plus, if the sift fails; at least you KNOW you were gonna be completely boned - but now you're not because you sifted past it.

• 2013-07-28 15:41:13: Link commented on Sifting Sands

  After looking at your comparisons, the effect probably needs to cost , since 2cmc ramp is no longer available to colors other than green. Of course, there's always the chance that this will fizzle, so I feel like should be okay.

• 2013-07-28 15:39:24: Link commented on Thassa's Blessing

  I've tried to make the others, like Nylea's Chant, so that they would work well on an Overloaded spell. This doesn't do much with overload, though.

• 2013-07-28 08:11:38: Alex commented on Sifting Sands

  Nice name :)

  The effect is very interesting. It's something like a colourless Rampant Growth, which is pretty strong - except it's not very likely to fix your colours. Or it's like an unpredictable one of Marble Diamond, Sky Diamond etc :)