Community Mashup Set: Recent Activity
Community Mashup Set: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Recent updates to Community Mashup Set: (Generated at 2025-07-05 15:27:58)
Community Mashup Set: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Recent updates to Community Mashup Set: (Generated at 2025-07-05 15:27:58)
Nice. I like it.
Reviving Vapors + Sudden Impact
Hellion Crucible + discard
Sensei's Divining Top + discard
Gush + Redirect
Extinction + Phyrexian Rebirth
Funnily enough, I didn't find any effects that made a creature become something with set characteristics (that wasn't a copy) until end of turn, so I wasn't sure about the template. The "loses all abilities" is redundant and makes it wordier, but it's easier to understand that way.
Mind Rot + Wings of Velis Vel
It's okay, but I don't see anything blue about it. I'd expect "and gains 'Whenever this creature deals combat damage to a creature, return that creature to its owner's hand.'" or something like that.
This is deceptively powerful. Aggresively-costed tutors are one thing. But two cards for three mana, especially if there's a potential combo between them, is just insane. If they didn't want to push this, it could easily cost

.
@Chris Doh, you're right.
Hmm... I'm trying to figure out if this can be used to fetch a Vivid Crag after you depleted the counters from a Vivid Creek. Fellwar Stone seems to think it can't, since, if I had a Fellwar Stone, and you had a Vivid Crag, I could produce any mana with my stone. That's a shame (for this card... not the stone).
Well, yes. If I have just Forests, I can't produce blue. City of Brass can, ergo I can find it.
You may have been meaning "which cannot produce mana of the same colour as any land you control", or something similar.
But this is, which can produce a colour the lands you already control CAN'T. The reverse would be interesting too, but would basically just reward powerful dual and five-colour lands even more so I couldn't be bothered to make it.
I think the efficiency of green's creature search varies wildly, a bit like its card draw, so sometimes it gets something quite anaemic, and sometimes it gets green sun's zenith or birthing pod. And that maybe there's not supposed to be a critical mass of it, so you can play "green decks that get a bit more consistency" but not usually "green combo deck".
Make the land and creature have to be the same colour? (you know what I mean wrt land colour)
More or less, this becomes "search for City of Brass" (or whatever 5-colour land you're running) Which is probably fine, actually.
Reminds me of Gift of the Gargantuan. (And curiously this is waay better than it, when this didn't look obviously too strong to me, by comparison to Eladamri's Call or Living Wish.) I think green is the colour that gets to search for creatures, though; I don't think Brutalizer Exarch was meant to be one of New Phyrexia's colour-bleed cards.
Another mash-up of ((C22100)) and Fertilize
This time, taking the obvious approach of searching for both a creature and a land, which seems very green, but I don't think anything does yet?
I'm not sure what this should cost, or if it should put some restriction (eg. a green creature and a forest). Or if it should put the land onto the battlefield.
I think current standards try to give green some creature searching, but without making it as universally tutoring as blue or black. So ideally this would offer some restriction. I was thinking about perhaps "a creature not in play" or "a creature other than the one your opponent names" when I thought of the previous mashup.
Mashup of ((C22100)) and Fertilize
There were several directions I could go with this. I decided to start with the flavour of "search for a legendary land", except I don't want to actually search for a legendary land, because that just enables noninteractive combo decks that win with a card no-one can kill or counterspell.
Instead, I said what's like searching for a legendary land? Searching for a land you don't have yet! This works badly with lots of dual lands, and not at all with five-colour or colourless lands. But if you want lots of diversity, it works well.
I'm not sure if it's too good or too useless.
It is indeed a blocker, and yes, that's a nice variant on "I'm winning, I shall win more!"