Community Mashup Set: Recent Activity
| Community Mashup Set: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Recent updates to Community Mashup Set: (Generated at 2025-07-05 10:18:43)
| Community Mashup Set: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Recent updates to Community Mashup Set: (Generated at 2025-07-05 10:18:43)
mmm, probably you're right. Crossblighted cantrips on death into an automatic Immolation (ish, instant variant on it) though. Probably gives too much mana towards the thing you get though; and you're right it should have "Otherwise, discard it" at least. Upcosting too.
Cantripping the creature if it's about to die seems pretty good (in fact, a little too good for a red common bear), so you should almost always do it, and the instant and mana is just a gift. It would probably work better as a dies trigger (and, say,
or something).
You know, I thought this was aggresive at first, for being "one mana: everyone loses 1 life", but then I realized this isn't even symmetrical. Just mill yourself a bit and you have "one mana: opponent loses 1 life".
renamed
Corrupt Eunuchs + Crossblighted Rager
Do I even want to know the flavour behind corrupt eunuchs?
Anyhow. clearly the result is a 2/2 red creature, that in some way damages other creatures by 2.
And they both turn into a spell. I think we can go directly to that concept, in fact.
Probably pretty blue, despite the random factor - so I made it double red. Because I am entirely porous to logic.
Yeah; it's very aggressive - but so are its source creatures.
Maybe I should at least upcost the activation (as the witch did)
"Each player loses 1 life unless he or she exiles a creature card from his or her graveyard."
This is actually pretty aggresive. After some activations, it's 1 life per mana, even if it's to both.
Spiteflame Witch + Titaniconda
Hmm. Symmetric player pain, plus a giant snake that gets fat and lazy when eats corpses.
Could have a creature that exiles from everyone's graveyard?
Mashup of Unweave and Salidar the Undying.
Simplified Salidar slightly. Instead of drawing strength from your creatures, she draws strength from your artifacts, as on unweave. Unweave suggests it should be artifact or enchantment, but black can't eat its own enchantments.
I wanted another line where you gain life equal to the CMC, but it got too busy.
I used the suggestion of using "he" or "she" on a legendary creature, even though it's not standard.
Magus of the Vineyard + Symbol of Hatred
Hmm, everyone gets mana, everyone else's creatures are rubbish.
The obvious mash would be "Your creatures are bigger", or maybe "all creatures are bigger". A bit boring though. "All creatures are bigger on their controllers turn"? That's got legs, though it's more red really.
Well, being a red card isn't a complete barrier to existence. Enchantment or creature? Let's do a living enchantment. Because I can. Call back to the good old Orcish Oriflamme. (And use the stupid new 'other creatures' wording)
I Bask in Your Silent Awe + For Rest
Um... yeah.
Ok; Arcane Laboratory, Rule of Law says this is actually a reasonably cheap effect if it's symmetric. Curse of Exhaustion puts it not MUCH more expensive if it's not.
So putting it on a land isn't actually terribly unfair. Let's make it a soft limit. Most of the time this will just be
:
and thus pretty bad. But multiplayer it gets pretty darn good.
Too good? It's like an Urza's Tower only instead of playing a 3-piece land combo, you have to play with 3 opponents. 3-piece combos are more powerful nowadays, but... I think I'd best add the limit clause. It's more like the scheme that way anyhow.
As far as this card cares, though; either choice is fine.
Intent isn't enough. Templating (at this level) makes a difference to rules consequences. Should this re-trigger Confusion in the Ranks? The two possible wordings of this (Shiny Umbreon's one or "If enchanted creature would die, its controller may attach ~ to another creature, then that creature dies" or something along those lines) have rather different rules implications.
Having argued that templating matters and intent isn't enough: it doesn't have to be the same person. Somebody needs to worry about templating before a card makes it to print, but it's fine if you don't want to be that person, though.
Meh, templating can bite me. Intent is clear.
"its controller may return Bloodlust (not the legends one) to the battlefield attached to target creature."
It still doesn't work that you target as a cost, and your wording doesn't really forbid you from doing it while it is untapped. The untap symbol is pretty much what you want, although as noted it goes infinite way too easily.
Anyway, kinda cool card. But repeated shuffling for something minimal is not that cool.
I take umbrage at classifying a four-colour gold as mono blue :)
Surely (no white), it's Uuuuubrg. Which is... a ghost with indigestion?
The pump ability should either be +1/-1 or not be
. Mono-blue doesn't get firebreathing (nowadays).
Given the canonical order of sets of four mana symbols in costs, I think the most pronouncable is "Rrrgwuuu!" Which sounds like some sort of ghost zombie.
make it bigger, to at least give SOME justification to the size. And merge the abilities.