Community Mashup Set: Recent Activity
| Community Mashup Set: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Recent updates to Community Mashup Set: (Generated at 2025-07-05 11:15:18)
| Community Mashup Set: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Recent updates to Community Mashup Set: (Generated at 2025-07-05 11:15:18)
Island + Stonewall builder
Hmm. A blue castle. And Island Sanctuary: a) already exists. b) is white.
If I had to guess what a blue defence would be, it'd be shroud. And.. actually, that's not too horrible if it's only your defending creatures that get it?
Ok, I can get behind that. What's a blue castle called though?
Well, it's a little bit sneakier in multiplayer; and if they have beneficial auras it's not quite murder, since they can choose which one to kill. But I figured Fear+Unholy Strength was just too much.
Hmm. So it's a bit like Phyrexian Boon. It'll only destroy the chosen creature if there aren't any other Auras out... though I guess if you're putting this in your deck, you can avoid putting any other beneficial Auras in your deck, so yeah, it's a sorcery speed Murder. I think that could still go a little cheaper, but okay, I guess 3 mana maybe isn't so bad.
Well, apart from being able to use it as a sorcery speed terror... Which means I really can't downcost it very far. Also, is it sufficient to say "A different enchanted creature" to stop them all choosing the same one, in multiplayer?
And it appears strictly worse than Unholy Strength now.
And now it's nto so flyspeck - but the name doesn't make sense. Gah!
(Probably ought to drop the intimidate or raise the cost, thinking about it. This is too flexible/good. Intimidate is gone, though that does make this a lot less worth the both of using on your own stuff now.)
Zephid's Embrace + Five-Dollar Wrench +2/+2, flying, shroud; destroy (enchanted, dammit) creature.
Hah; I hit a silly idea on the way to this card. "Enchanted creature has Intimidate and is colourless".
Anyway - card started off very silly "Yes! An overpowered +9/+9 enchantment with hexproof" that killed the creature when you put it on.
And then I realised; I could combine "Unholy Strength" and "Terror" to make a very nice little card. Throw it onto an opponents creature to make them kill it. Or throw it onto something that regenerates on your side of the table, and enjoy the power.
Flysepck is caused by the flavourtext; but I LIKE the flavourtext.
oops, forgot the flying
Errant Ephemeron + Spacefold Mishap
Air Elemental, Suspend, Illusion, Remove Soul, Space: The Convergence.
Let's just go full on space terminology for suspend.
I reckon "Destroys modular" is pretty much a niche thing. Glad I managed to find a useful niche, though.
Actually, I consider this quite flexible and strong. Samurai of the PC was a reason to play white, in an environment that didn't have a white deck. It should be noted this ability hunts "When this creature dies" triggers... which is what SotPC was so valued for. It destroyed Modular.
Mmm. Yeah, I could see this in Kamigawa block, say, where all the Spirits had dies-triggers and Soulshift etc. They had Samurai of the Pale Curtain, and I could see this in similar vein.
Cremate + Carrier of Justice Graveyard clearing, exile, pump another blocked - and both cantrip.
Taking, pretty much solely the UEOT from carrier; but exile is a white thing, mostly. This ends up a pretty niche card; but it'll have its uses.
Oh, good point. That would actually be someone appropriate (most of the time, the ability might as well be "sacrifice an illusion, counter target spell that would deal damage to you") but it's not right if popping the illusion fizzles the ability, yeah.
Also, targetting Illusions runs the risk of them going boom like Phantasmal Bear
Yeah I know, but I wanted to avoid that in search of the nicely ambiguous-ish natural wording.
It seems like the normal templating would be "to target illusion you control instead". That doesn't seem completely necessary when it's being dealt to your creature, but it's what most redirection effects on gatherer do, and also neatly specifies that you do have a creature to redirect to.
Nifty. I like it when you can get close to the natural way of writing something and have it still work.
I think you're fine Vitenka. The card just makes you try to do something you can't (redirect damage to an object that doesn't exist) and the effect fails to happen. It's kind of like a card that asks you to sacrifice a creature, when you don't have a creature.
Oh fiddlesticks. It probably just makes you invulnerable if you don't have any illusions, doesn't it?
Append "If that spell destroys the illusion, it also destroys this."? (not ~this~)
pun rename; probably pushing it
Righteous Aura + Scout Ahead
Reduce lifeloss to 2, illusions draw you cards. Illusions reduce your lifeloss? That sounds fine. though, really, blue shouldn't get such a blatantly white effect. Loving the wording here though - the m:tg rules enforce that it has to be a pre-existing illusion - but it sure reads like the enchantment provides.
Changed from "A source" to "a spell" primarily for the even lovlier wording, (although "it deals it2 is just ew) and also because it makes it something blue can do. "Protection from spells (as long as you control an illusion)" is just a poor mans "You have hexproof" after all. Which.. uh.. it turns out is actually an ability granted by a white cat. "Oh Hai!" says Spirit of the Hearth. I hereby justify it on the basis that this is a VERY weak version, and that cat is clearly cyan.
For card wording purposes, I do not want to clarify who chooses the illusion. For me understanding purposes - it's this enchantments controller, and at the time the damage resolves, right?
remove flyspeck flavourtext that I meant to paste in as a comment.