Tesla Project: Recent Activity

Mechanics | Skeleton | Storyline | Limited Archetypes | Creature Types

Recent updates to Tesla Project: (Generated at 2025-05-14 22:11:23)

2016-07-22 19:13:24: Inanimate edited Aerial Repairman:
Unskeleton'd, moved to contenders
2016-07-22 19:13:01: Inanimate commented on Induction Field

Possibility for CW11. Now that we're tracking contenders, I'll take some of my placeholders out of the skeleton and into the contenders position.
2016-07-22 19:12:40: Inanimate edited Induction Field
2016-07-22 19:10:55: Inanimate commented on Weapons Cache

Just going to note that the UL cycle is strictly better than the cycle in SOI. That's fine, but it's just a conscious choice.
2016-07-22 19:10:04: Inanimate edited the details page Skeleton
2016-07-22 19:09:55: Inanimate edited the details page Skeleton
2016-07-22 19:06:16: Inanimate commented on Consulate Colonists

Putting this in for CG05 for now
2016-07-22 19:05:58: Inanimate edited Consulate Colonists
2016-07-22 19:02:18: Inanimate edited Vicious Seengshir:
Made this into the horned tiger beast thing from Chandra's origin
2016-07-22 19:00:09: Inanimate edited Vicious Seengshir:
Changed this to be the horned tiger thing from Chandra's Origin.
2016-07-22 18:58:21: Inanimate edited Vanara Thrillseeker
2016-07-22 18:58:12: Inanimate commented on Vanara Thrillseeker

We need a vanilla, and I propose that this can be it
2016-07-22 18:52:44: Inanimate commented on Call to Action

In contention for CR16
2016-07-22 18:52:36: Inanimate commented on Double Cross

In contention for CR16
2016-07-22 18:52:09: Inanimate commented on Persuade the Meek

In contention for CR16
2016-07-22 18:51:56: Inanimate edited Persuade the Meek
2016-07-22 18:51:36: Inanimate commented on Road to Progress

In contention for CW16
2016-07-22 18:51:31: Inanimate commented on Progress' Glow

In contention for CW16
2016-07-22 18:51:04: Inanimate commented on Road to Progress

In contention for CW16
2016-07-22 18:18:06: Jackal commented on Hungry Hippo

It there a reason we want a pushed blue creature at common? Is this a set where blue should be more creature focused than average?
2016-07-22 17:53:47: Inanimate edited Hungry Hippo:
I agree with most of this reasoning. The card was intentionally pushed but probably too much so.
2016-07-22 04:04:55: Circeus commented on Hungry Hippo

Well, blue does not really get vanillas that are a) good or b) equal to or better than white's. That's how the color pie crumble. Deal with it.
2016-07-22 03:41:24: Doombringer commented on Hungry Hippo

3/5 is SOOOOOO BADDDDDDDD
2016-07-22 03:26:56: continuumg commented on Hungry Hippo

I would accept 3/5

Silent Artisan, Great-horn Krushok
2016-07-22 03:26:11: continuumg commented on Hungry Hippo

This should definitely not be this big. Compare to Ancient Carp, Armored Cancrix
2016-07-22 03:12:30: Inanimate commented on Double Cross

I think this is the design we ultimately will end up with, because the targets you want to sacrifice in the deck are the big attackers, and usually a player prefers those to the blockers, which is more of a secondary function of AoT.

However, playtesting both would be nice. Maybe we can randomly give people two versions of the set? :P
2016-07-22 02:21:52: Doombringer commented on Double Cross

Mainly as it doesn't second as a blocker remover while also meaning you have to survive an attack from a huge creature before you can steal it.
2016-07-22 02:12:57: Doombringer commented on Call to Action

I'll admit the super clean templating of this is tempting but I think this card is far stronger, maybe in an unhealthy manner that would go against what the archetype wants.

Note this card feels more in color pie to to punishing not attacking.
2016-07-22 01:59:57: Doombringer commented on Double Cross

I think I prefer this to Call to Action
2016-07-21 22:58:17: Link commented on Double Cross

Amusing.