Multiverse: Tesla Project: Recent Activity

2016-07-17 14:01:37: continuum commented on Galvanic Investiture

That could easily be solved with "When CARDNAME or another artifact..." or "When another..."

2016-07-17 14:00:08: continuum commented on Canister Buster

Actually, a card like that could block any creature, regardless of what that creature might have.

For this to work, perhaps "The timing of activated abilities of artifacts you control can't be restricted, except to any time you could cast an Instant." Which feels really weird.

2016-07-16 22:53:56: Jack V commented on Canister Buster

I've seen several amateur designs of creatures with "this can block creatures as though they had no abilities". Is it the case that wording mean it could block creatures with keyword evasion like flying but not spelt out ones (obv that would be a good reason never to print it)

2016-07-16 16:39:29: continuumg commented on Canister Buster

Equip abilities are restricted to Sorcery speed within the rules, while activated abilities are by default not restricted. Whenever a card says you can do something (this card) and another says you can't (Cards with Recharge), the one that says you can't takes precedence.

2016-07-16 13:54:45: Jack V commented on Canister Buster

I understand the reason not. Intuitively I feel like it should: the rule only makes sense if it's cancelling out another rule that says they can't be used at instant speed. But I can't think of any other similar precedents.

2016-07-16 02:18:05: Inanimate commented on Galvanic Investiture

Wouldn't that exacerbate the problem? And lead to the issue of whether it triggers upon itself.

2016-07-16 02:11:43: Doombringer commented on Galvanic Investiture

Could this be an uncommon artifact?

2016-07-16 02:08:44: Doombringer commented on Spread of Wings

Is this the type of gameplay we want at common? I think I'd prefer this at uncommon.

2016-07-16 02:05:19: Inanimate commented on Galvanic Investiture

It's a draft-around, but I don't think it's an absurd one. However, upping the cost won't hurt it significantly, I think.

I think it making lands into 4/4s when artifacts enter is too disconnected.

2016-07-15 14:24:32: Alex commented on Spread of Wings

Wow, cool. Like Prison Term but beneficial. Nice.

2016-07-15 04:58:31: Jackal commented on Ruthless Collector

I like things like "Put a 2/2 creature token into play and then sacrifice a creature" because it can be used to upgrade a small creature or just to trigger things. I'm not sure how many permanents are worse than a canister. It might be nice if this was more like a 2/1 so that the body is closer value to that canister but I don't know if there is a price that people would want that at.

2016-07-15 04:44:46: Jackal commented on Galvanic Investiture

Is it too weird if putting artifacts into play turned a land into 4/4 haste creature for a turn.

This would essentially add one mana to the cost of using it (which I think would be good if we want to print anything that makes a lot of artifacts) and would make the creatures not have flying.

2016-07-15 01:05:14: Circeus commented on Canister Buster

@Continuumg How could it possibly not work if Leonin Shikari does?

2016-07-15 01:03:16: Circeus commented on Galvanic Investiture

Really? This is a first pick draft-around right there, and I would never play it in a deck if I couldn't be sure I wouldn't get artifacts in play after it, this taken into account, I'm up the price if it stays at uncommon. Heck, I wouldn't think this card to be inappropriate as a rare eithyer.

2016-07-15 00:42:11: Inanimate commented on Canister Buster

I have an interesting design I'll be posting later as a part of my article today. I'll put it in the Multiverse soon!

2016-07-15 00:41:28: Inanimate commented on Galvanic Investiture

I'm pretty sure the number of times this is on the field and you play a creature that makes a thopter after it is going to be minimal enough that this is fine. Still, it's definitely a risky one!

2016-07-15 00:34:19: continuumg commented on Canister Buster

Likewise. I'm also still sure it doesn't work within the rules.

2016-07-14 21:32:01: Circeus commented on Galvanic Investiture

I think this would need to cost at least {3} {u} {r} . I mean, it makes all thopters flying hasty 4/4s...

2016-07-14 19:36:20: Inanimate commented on Canister Buster

I'm still not a huge fan of this.

2016-07-14 19:03:59: Inanimate commented on Ruthless Collector

This might be too nasty or weird. Just let me know if that's the case.

2016-07-14 19:03:34: Inanimate edited the details page Limited Archetypes

2016-07-14 19:03:20: Inanimate edited Ruthless Collector:

Flavor change as well

2016-07-14 19:02:38: Inanimate edited Ruthless Collector:

4/4 -> 3/3, recharges before making everyone sacrifice

2016-07-14 19:02:03: Inanimate commented on Ruthless Collector

I have a cute idea for this, adjusting it accordingly.

2016-07-14 18:53:36: Inanimate commented on Hungry Shade

Better in {b} {r} due to their new theme!

2016-07-14 18:46:55: Inanimate commented on Waterlore Naga

This card feels odd to me. It's frustrating to want things in your yard but be unable to discard them. I'm increasingly thinking that, rather than have a weird conditional looter at common, we might just want a powerful unconditional looter at uncommon.

2016-07-14 18:37:19: Inanimate created and commented on the card Galvanic Investiture

A fun idea I got for a blue/red uncommon. Maybe too much, but it could be a fun rare, if not a fun uncommon. Funcommon.

2016-07-14 18:20:34: Inanimate commented on Galvanic Charger

I will note that it's kinda odd that all the multicolor gold uncommons are creatures. Could this be an instant/sorcery, or enchantment?...

2016-07-14 18:19:03: Inanimate edited Galvanic Charger:

Giving this hexproof to make it a little more blue. It also makes it a little more effective as a surprise attacker.

2016-07-14 18:17:09: Inanimate edited the details page Limited Archetypes