Sienira's Facets: Recent Activity
| Sienira's Facets: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | The Facets Of Sienira | Keyword Mechanics | FAQ |
Recent updates to Sienira's Facets: (Generated at 2025-05-03 00:17:27)
I see the problem. It's possible to a) say that some black cards should be enchantments, like some black cards are instants b) make it do something overwhelming but not outright winning, or otherwise contingent c) tweak the mechanics so it does aproximately the same thing but feels like a sorcery. I debated alternatives for c), but nothing seemed perfect.
"At the next end step" wouldn't quite be an enchantment as it would only happen once, but I agree it's not quite a sorcery. The same would apply to having the sorcery work or be cast from the graveyard.
You think? It's less than a full Orrery - it only applies to sorceries. Other creatures at RR include Stigma Lasher, Blood Knight and Warren Instigator, all of which have effective 2 power and pretty strong effects. Do others think the power here is too high? I'm sure I could make him a 2/2 for 2R, but I might prefer not to.
You think? It's less than a full Orrery - it only applies to sorceries. Other creatures at RR include Stigma Lasher, Blood Knight and Warren Instigator, all of which have effective 2 power and pretty strong effects. Do others think the power here is too high? I'm sure I could make him a 2/2 for 2R, but I might prefer not to.
You think? It's less than a full Orrery - it only applies to sorceries. Other creatures at RR include Stigma Lasher, Blood Knight and Warren Instigator, all of which have effective 2 power and pretty strong effects. Do others think the power here is too high? I'm sure I could make him a 2/2 for 2R, but I might prefer not to.
I wondered about that. But that wording really, really seems like "I want to be an enchantment, I'm just being hacked into sorcery form".
You think? It's less than a full Orrery - it only applies to sorceries. Other creatures at RR include Stigma Lasher, Blood Knight and Warren Instigator, all of which have effective 2 power and pretty strong effects. Do others think the power here is too high? I'm sure I could make him a 2/2 for 2R, but I might prefer not to.
I think this needs a better name. Any ideas?
:):) See the Testy set for more of these...
I think this needs a better name. Any ideas?
I think this needs a better name. Any ideas?
I think this needs a better name. Any ideas?
Shiny cardframe! CSS3 gradients!
It takes a second to realize that the rage counter is simply a memory device. Given that it counts your opponents' lands, I can see trample being so worth the sacrifice. On the other hand, Timmy is more likely to stick with sheer size.
Mmm, fair suggestion. Though at that point the other two Dons start feeling short-changed, like they should get to be a Human Rogue Wizard and a Human Rogue Somethingelse. Not to mention the absence of space on the type line.
It takes a second to realize that the rage counter is simply a memory device. Given that it counts your opponents' lands, I can see trample being so worth the sacrifice. On the other hand, Timmy is more likely to stick with sheer size.
You think? It's less than a full Orrery - it only applies to sorceries. Other creatures at RR include Stigma Lasher, Blood Knight and Warren Instigator, all of which have effective 2 power and pretty strong effects. Do others think the power here is too high? I'm sure I could make him a 2/2 for 2R, but I might prefer not to.
For flavour it really does want to be a Sorcery. How about "At the beginning of the next end step, if..."?
You think? It's less than a full Orrery - it only applies to sorceries. Other creatures at RR include Stigma Lasher, Blood Knight and Warren Instigator, all of which have effective 2 power and pretty strong effects. Do others think the power here is too high? I'm sure I could make him a 2/2 for 2R, but I might prefer not to.
It takes a second to realize that the rage counter is simply a memory device. Given that it counts your opponents' lands, I can see trample being so worth the sacrifice. On the other hand, Timmy is more likely to stick with sheer size.
It takes a second to realize that the rage counter is simply a memory device. Given that it counts your opponents' lands, I can see trample being so worth the sacrifice. On the other hand, Timmy is more likely to stick with sheer size.
He could be both - though that summons up images of an assassin out of control.
He should arguably be a Rogue to fit with the general tribe for the criminals, but the rules text is blatantly an Assassin.
It takes a second to realize that the rage counter is simply a memory device. Given that it counts your opponents' lands, I can see trample being so worth the sacrifice. On the other hand, Timmy is more likely to stick with sheer size.
It takes a second to realize that the rage counter is simply a memory device. Given that it counts your opponents' lands, I can see trample being so worth the sacrifice. On the other hand, Timmy is more likely to stick with sheer size.
Missing flavourtext: "Wheeeeeeeee!"
The FAQ makes it sound like the double-exile trick is by design, instead of an unfortunate loophole.
The FAQ makes it sound like the double-exile trick is by design, instead of an unfortunate loophole.
Annnd the current wording seems more suited to "Zombies are blue" than an every-turn thing.