Cards With No Home: Recent Activity
| Cards With No Home: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Other non-themed cardsets | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Cards With No Home: (Generated at 2024-10-05 10:34:07)
Page 1 - Older activity
Page 1 - Older activity
If a 2/2 white Knight creature token has four +1/+1 counters on it, the creature exists as having base power of -5/-5. If a +1/+1 counter is removed, the creature's power and toughness will automatically recalculate to 1/1 without the creature dying. However, a single -1/-1 counter will kill the Knight.
Llanowar Elves is a 4/4, Llanowar Elves with two -1/-1 counters is a 4/4, with a base power and toughness of 6/6. If any number of -1/-1 counters (or other -X/-X effects) affect that Llanowar Elves, its base power and toughness automatically recalculate to maintain a power and toughness of at least 4/4.
See Mardu Reformstion.
See Jeskai Reformation.
I think this could complete the cycle of Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth, Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth, Blood Moon, Harbinger of the Seas
Being unblockable over a nonbasic land feels red. The counter taking probably bends out of black removing counters, though I don't know if there's a color that already takes counters from opponent's creatures in such a way.
At five mana, it is quite expensive for a small body.
While I at first took this as meant to hose opponent's an opponent's playstyle, the right environment this could effectively be a big beat-stick as this accumulates your other +1/+1 counters (and it's not like black doesn't have indestructible instant spells)
Well, it's not really fair. It's "Gimme all your counters". So sure, red for the emotion of greed. I do agree this is probably too late for the effect. Though it's a very strong effect. Like "This card exists? That deck archetype cannot exist". Which makes this a sideboard uncommon rather than a build-hint uncommon.
To be a build hint... cheaper and gains a copy of the tokens? To be a usable anti-deck-sweeper at this cost - how about it hoovers up all counters that exist when it ETBs?
Assuming that the '+1/+1 etb' is instead 'a +1/+1 would be put on a creature'... that still goes a bit funny if you have two of this in play. That plus doubling season is infinite I think; but that's in the general pool of "Doubling season goes infinite" and not really worth worrying about.
Okay firstly, templating.
Secondly, a 2/2 for FIVE mana that hates on counters and can't be blocked if they control a single non-basic is still pretty bad. I want to be winning the game on turn 5, not playing a creature that can swing in for 2 or maybe 3 damage next turn.
Thirdly; Colour. Why is this rakdos? White is the colour of fairness. What is red and passionate about this card?
Okay firstly, templating.
Secondly, a 2/2 for FIVE mana that hates on counters and can't be blocked if they control a single non-basic is still pretty bad. I want to be winning the game on turn 5, not playing a creature that can swing in for 2 or maybe 3 damage next turn.
Thirdly; Colour. Why is this rakdos? White is the colour of fairness. What is red and passionate about this card?
World is fuck?
Interesting. I think it’d be a signpost uncommon.