Cards With No Home: Recent Activity
| Cards With No Home: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Other non-themed cardsets |
Recent updates to Cards With No Home: (Generated at 2017-10-18 14:45:21)
Page 1 - Older activity
Page 1 - Older activity
Huh. That's a good green trigger I don't think I've seen before. Nifty.
Yeah; and unlike Shaharazed; it's not even fun in casual, and you can't come up with aspiraitonally silly decks to go infinite and win by decking your opponents deck.
It's just "Well, that sucked; let's try again".
This is Shaharazad levels of instabanned in almodt every format.
The adjustment was me trying to make it so that you can't play the card again in the same match. Although I guess if you had multiples in your deck and them being removed dropped the number of cards in your deck to less 60 you'd automatically lose or be disqualified?
If an opponent played Strong Heart after you played it, the match would still be best out of five, however the opponent would get the benefit of their starting life total being 24.
"You can only."?
What's the intended result if you play this in a best-out-of-five? Best-out-of-one? Two-Headed Giant?
It's crazy how one simple ruling generated so much discussion.
Changed color because it didn't have any particularly green ability. Decreased the loyalty because I don't need to compensate the damage anymore. Might change first ability to a [+1] later.
Changed [0] ability so it does not lose loyalty while it's a creature. Also, It was green and had 10 loyalty before.
There's no ordering issue, because there's only one delayed triggered ability. The "can't lose" state simply wears off at end step, simultaneous with putting end step triggers on the stack. Then the triggers resolve.
Maybe. You can also merge the endstep clauses. And the haste can be more general, since it won't matter.
You've also got an ordering issue - you could choose to have the "lose the game" happen before your "cannot lose the game" wears off. Which is kinda rotten.
How about:
Draw 5 cards.
Creatures you control have haste.
Until the end of your turn, you cannot lose the game.
Then you do.
This card would probably be legible if not for unnecessary line breaks.
No longer a mix of depletion lands and Filter lands.
That's why I suggested the wording that I did. It does make sense that this would be 5c, I just meant to say that it could fit just in green.
Plausibly; but it's intended for a five-colour deck. If all your cards are five colour (or nearly, for those with CMC 4 or less) then you'll be sure to be able to drop 5 things; where your opponents can probably only drop 1 or 2. So this mana cost is a really big hint in that direction.
(Sadly, of course, the simplest way to play 5-colour is with a monno-green mana base. But let's pretend.)
Yeah, sadly. You would probably have to follow the wording of Conflux to properly get the effect you're looking for. "Each player may put a white permanent card, a blue permanent card, a black pregnant card, a red permanent card, and a green permanent card from his or her hand into the battlefield."
I suspect this could cost mono-green, tbh.
That's longenating it, not shoterablising it! (Hand, obv.)
From where?
I think I'd rather just have Mystic Monastery, if this didn't have a basic land type.
an attempt at mixing the Lorwyn filterlands with the depletion lands (in Wedge colors)
Damn wording. This should be shorterable.