Cards With No Home: Recent Activity
| Cards With No Home: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Other non-themed cardsets | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Cards With No Home: (Generated at 2019-07-18 22:29:08)
Page 1 - Older activity
Page 1 - Older activity
This is encroach in simic, but it cantrips and you can hit the top card if you need to; and it hits basics.
Just feels out of colour. Maybe if this was GB? And they drew a card if you pulled one from their hand?
Well you can see animate dead enchanting a creature card in the graveyard. Originally I wanted it to read, "Enchant creature card" but I think that would mean it could technically enchant cards in your hand, graveyard, exile, etc. Which would function mostly fine if they're revealed but what's to stop you enchanting a card in your hand that only you know about? Or a card in your deck that even you can't see.
See Flayer's Gift.
Given the comments, I made it so that this no longer fixes for color. Now you can still use it on yourself to cast something as an instant, but with the drawback of revealing your hand. It's also significantly less likely you'll be able to cast an opponent's card, though.
No longer washes mana requirements.
There are drawbacks in that the card does nothing but give you a non-cantrip Peek if you cant cast any spells in that player's hand. In that way it can sometimes be a worse choice than Duress or even Pain. But I got to agree that this can be a monster. At the very least, it makes a better counterspell for your opponents cheap spells when playing Draw-Go. Got a Dual Shot stuck in your hand? Don't mind if I do!
I would think that restricting this card to just Instants or Sorceries would keep things under control. That way you're either playing risky, playing other cards that let you see your opponent's hand, or sideboarding against a deck full of instants/sorceries. "Backbreaking, but only in the right scenarios" sounds good to me, power-level-wise.
I totally get why a person wouldn't want to design towards a niche, though. So let's presume the text isn't changing. Then I'd say this card needs to costs at least
. As it stands, I have a hard time coming to grips with this card being easier to cast than Twincast... but I get how Twincast can double your own stuff and this can't.
This seems really strong, especially given it's ub hybrid. It's at least a two-car combo, but you can pretty much run any color in either black or blue.
Yes, it's very nice. :)
The relevant SBA is "704.5m If an Aura is attached to an illegal object or player, or is not attached to an object or player, that Aura is put into its owner’s graveyard." The clever wording of this enchant ability means that the creature dying doesn't make it an illegal object, so this SBA doesn't apply and the aura remains on the battlefield.
It's a very clever design and I love the flavor
Uh; is this meant to re-animate a thing more than once? The name suggests it, but I'm pretty sure it still falls off when the creature dies. Nice idea and flavour, though.
It has been pointed out to me this card lacks "until end of turn".
"Prevent ... until" would need to be defined in the rules. Whether this works or not depends on whether you are able to write tight rules for this. As written and without change to the rules it does not work as the current assumption is that "prevent" means "replace with nothing".
You want to replace it with a delayed event rather than "nothing" - but in no way the rules recognize since they know e. g. delayed triggers, but those use the stack and your phrasing doesn't use any of the language associated with triggered abilities.
Seems like a thing you could do. Though also - apart from flavour - why? Both it and the things hitting it still deal damage in the same step; it's just after main2.
Idea: combat damage doesn't happen until endstep. The damage should still be tripled. Does this work?
This is what I get for not making a mechanic through Multiverse. It's supposed to say "rounded up."
I like this card, and I like charge. Good ideas all around.
Though, I don't like rounding down halfsies. It seems unnecessarily complicated compared to "lose 2" or "lose 1 counter per turn". Also, if you're rounding down, then you will never lose that last counter.
But these are picky points. If Wizards printed this card, I wouldn't be griping about the numbers. I'd be looking for more charge cards.
🤷♂️
That would work perfectly.
Hence "cost appropriately", I think my proposed version would not serve as a 1-drop.
But now that you mention it, at common you may want to use flat boosts e. g. "~ gets +1/+0 as long as your have a charge."
Hmmm, on its own it's a 2/1 haste for 1. That's strong, but red gets that. If does it via the set mechanic; rather than flat - but that's not a reason to move it out of common.
That you can instead drop a couple of them and do nasty things slightly later in the game might be though. The possibility of this being 11/1 with haste seems like it would be a problem.