Link's Unplaced Cards: Recent Activity

Link's Unplaced Cards: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

Mechanics

Recent updates to Link's Unplaced Cards: (Generated at 2026-06-15 06:58:11)

• 2012-03-03 14:33:50: Link edited Immé, Allmother:

  Revamped.

• 2012-03-03 14:33:19: Link edited Immé, Allmother
• 2012-03-02 19:17:28: Link created the card Immé, Allmother
• 2012-03-02 19:11:47: Link edited Redirecting Whip
• 2012-03-02 19:11:27: Link commented on Redirecting Whip

  It's also sort of like "When equipped creature blocks, it gets +2/+0 and the creature it's blocking gets -2/-0."

• 2012-03-02 18:06:19: Vitenka commented on Redirecting Whip

  Hmmm. It's pretty much the same as +2/+2. Not quite, given it might block a 1/3 or a 2/7 deathtouch, but nearly.

  So I'd guess 2 and 2?

  Ooh, actually - it's closer to rampage 2, isn't it? Really REALLY good if you can block multiple creatures somehow. I think the cost is still 2 though.

• 2012-03-02 17:50:40: Link edited Redirecting Whip:

  Typo

• 2012-03-02 17:50:03: Link commented on Redirecting Whip

  I don't know what costs would be fair for this.

• 2012-03-02 17:49:32: Link created the card Redirecting Whip
• 2012-03-01 06:24:46: Link commented on Marthanos, Sage of Battle

  Mmm, yes... perhaps the vigilance should go. I'm too in love with vigilance + tap abilities.

• 2012-03-01 06:09:10: Mandroid commented on Marthanos, Sage of Battle

  Honestly, I like the green ability but this guy seems almost too good for EDH. I really think without Vigilance he'd be more balanced since he's already debatably better than Chorus of the Conclave since he's cheaper. Also a limited bomb. Seems like a mythic to me. I'd like to build an EDH deck with this guy.

• 2012-03-01 05:49:11: Link commented on Marthanos, Sage of Battle

  ­Mikaeus, the Lunarch makes me wonder if Marthanos should be Mythic.

• 2012-03-01 05:43:33: Link edited Marthanos, Sage of Battle:

  Made the second ability only affect your creatures.

• 2012-02-28 13:52:20: Link commented on Gilt-Horn Oryx

  Several of the other antelopes have defensive stats, and I thought it would be cute to mirror one of the few other plainswalkers. I guess it could also be 2/3.

• 2012-02-28 09:35:02: Jack V commented on Gilt-Horn Oryx

  I think the GW "untap a forest or plains" is interesting whether or not it has any extra abilities. (In fact, it maybe should be GR, although I like the flavour of the current version.) There have been several "when this attacks, untap", but I'm not sure there was one this simple, and it would be perfect in an aggressive mana-heavy G/C deck.

• 2012-02-28 08:48:48: Alex commented on Gilt-Horn Oryx

  It's quirky, but I like it.

  I could see it at either uncommon or rare.

• 2012-02-28 05:43:42: dude1818 commented on Gilt-Horn Oryx

  An evasion creature with an attack trigger, but the stats of a defender? It doesn't sit right with me. Unless it had vigilance as well, which push it well into the Chinese menu rare category, which is difficult to make aesthetically pleasing.

• 2012-02-28 05:36:11: Link commented on Gilt-Horn Oryx

  This is starting to feel more like a rare than an uncommon...

• 2012-02-28 05:35:58: Link edited Gilt-Horn Oryx
• 2012-02-28 05:19:03: Link commented on Gilt-Horn Oryx

  You're both right, it seems odd. Maybe if it was flavored as a herd of antelope, then trample would make sense. Would Forestwalk + Plainswalk be too much for this cost, size, and rarity? Plainswalk might be a nice reference to Graceful Antelope... In fact, maybe I'll make it a 1/4.

• 2012-02-28 04:30:52: dude1818 commented on Gilt-Horn Oryx

  That's a good catch, jmg. My question is why does an antelope have trample? That made more sense when it was a rhino. What if it had "Untapped Plainswalk" and "Untapped Forestwalk"? Or at least the regular versions of those two.

• 2012-02-28 04:01:03: jmgariepy commented on Gilt-Horn Oryx

  I might be a bit of a goofball for thinking this, but it seems odd to me that this creature has trample, but doesn't trigger on combat damage. Does this bother anyone else, or is it just me?

• 2012-02-28 01:11:17: Link edited Gilt-Horn Oryx:

  Changed creature type & added flavor text.

• 2012-02-27 14:28:50: Link edited Oath to Daneck:

  I toned down the power level slightly: made the first side only combat damage and the second side only spells.

• 2012-02-26 22:11:47: Link created the card Gilt-Horn Oryx
• 2012-02-26 14:50:53: Link edited Oath to Daneck:

  Changed wording on Oath to Daneck; added non-Illusion to prevent loop.

• 2012-02-26 14:44:21: Link commented on Oath to Daneck

  I woke up this morning with the intent to change it to that exact wording. That makes it sound like the Circle of Protection wording.

• 2012-02-26 09:21:44: Alex commented on Oath to Daneck

  I think it'd be worth trying to keep the tokens the same.

  I think there are problems with paying mana in the middle of replacement effects. The first ability might need to read:

  > : The next time a source an opponent controls would deal damage to you or a creature you control, put a 0/2 blue Illusion creature token onto the battlefield and that damage is dealt to that creature instead.

• 2012-02-26 06:53:30: Link moved a card out
• 2012-02-26 06:50:07: Link moved a card out