Infinite Potential Well: Recent Activity
Infinite Potential Well: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Planets and Gravity | Merge Gates | Madness | Venture into the House |
Recent updates to Infinite Potential Well: (Generated at 2025-07-17 12:44:36)
See Keleth, Lord of All Horses. Trying to avoid the Morophon, the Boundless problem by using niche tribes
See Kiora, Dominion over Seas. Trying to avoid the Morophon, the Boundless problem by using niche tribes
See Shepherd of Souls.
See Pilfering Pixie.
See Grabby Goblin.
See Cleverest Impersonator. Added rule for support: a land on the stack is put onto the battlefield as a state-based action
Added rule for support: a land on the stack is put onto the battlefield as a state-based action
I'm not talking about "digital-only" in general, I talk about "conjure" specifically. I can half-agree on a single card with conjure not really needing it in the place it is, but the alternative is at least quite wordy in that case.
Here? I propose a less wordy alternative.
There seem to be a lot of digital-only cards that don't really need the digital-only mechanics
Meh. I get that it is functionally different for graveyard interactions etc. but I feel that a card that could easily return itself to your hand rather than conjure a copy doesn't really qualify as a place to use conjure tech.
I suggest a similar variant of the mechanic on Trenna, Elemental Summoner. Some considerations I made:
Can we make it so that partner automatically implies the "~ can be your commander." text, though, at least on legendaries? Well, I just want Oathbreaker rules for Commaner anyway, but losing that line on a planeswalker saves sooo much space - and requiring both seems like sooo much overkill.
See Conflict of Interest. Expanding the definition of "partner with" like banding on defense. You always get the tutor effect, but I'm tweaking the commander rule to be "You can have two commanders if they are both legal commanders, and either they both have "partner" or one of them has "partner with X" and the other is X."