Tesla Project: Recent Activity

Mechanics | Skeleton | Storyline | Limited Archetypes | Creature Types

Recent updates to Tesla Project: (Generated at 2025-05-17 06:53:16)

2016-05-13 14:33:26: continuumg edited Shrink Replication:
Templating
2016-05-13 14:32:26: continuumg created and commented on the card Growth Replication
2016-05-13 01:44:32: continuumg commented on a card
2016-05-12 18:14:45: Inanimate commented on the cardset Tesla Project

Agreed, continuumg. It's a good way to sneak more artifacts into the set without warping the color distribution as much as normal - much like Magic Origins did it. Personally, that's always been a large part of the 'feel' of a non-Mirrodin artifact set for me... the idea that artifacts are built and produced rather than natural. Representing this through 'created' artifacts, like tokens and Develop, that are paired with colored cards... that seems perfect to me.

Anyway. For Overload and Replicate, that's up for discussion. I'd say that they'd be fine as five-color, with a slight emphasis in a color pair.
2016-05-12 17:38:19: dude1818 commented on Ghirapur Diplomat
2016-05-12 16:23:08: Jackal created and commented on the card Shrink Replication
2016-05-12 16:13:01: Jackal edited a mechanic in Tesla Project
2016-05-12 16:12:30: Jackal created a mechanic in Tesla Project
2016-05-11 05:17:16: continuumg created the card Growth Pulse
2016-05-11 00:23:42: continuumg commented on the cardset Tesla Project

Personally, I feel we should try making develop always become an artifact, to set a baseline for the mechanic, like how in the original Innistrad all DFCs were creatures on each side. I don't recall if this issue has been discussed yet.

Additionally, how were we thinking of distributing overload/replicate amongst the colours?

EDIT - If we like Develop into Artifacts, we may want to consider reducing the number of regular artifacts.
2016-05-10 18:19:32: Inanimate commented on the cardset Tesla Project

Current design targets for experimentation / testing out:

Develop at common, as simple as possible.

Raid at common, as interesting as possible.

Overload/Replicate at common, as different from Ravnica as possible.

Do note that while Overload has the potential for 'universal' effects (ones that do not specify a controller), these aren't going to feel good for players. There's a reason RTR avoided them. While we can have one or two at higher rarities, avoid them at common, please.
2016-05-10 03:46:36: Inanimate commented on Galvanic Charger

We might.
2016-05-09 15:47:07: continuumg commented on AEther Bolt

I like it at these numbers
2016-05-09 15:32:07: Jackal edited AEther Bolt:
Now more expensive and bigger. Was R=2-4
2016-05-09 05:18:44: continuumg commented on a card
2016-05-09 03:35:42: Circeus commented on Snake Charmer
2016-05-08 20:49:38: Alex deleted the card Lesser Asura from Tesla Project
2016-05-08 14:40:54: continuumg edited a card
2016-05-08 14:40:46: continuumg edited a card
2016-05-08 14:40:34: continuumg commented on a card
2016-05-08 14:40:04: continuumg edited Lesser Asura
2016-05-08 14:38:45: continuumg commented on Galvanic Charger

Do we have goblins?
2016-05-08 14:36:49: continuumg edited Lesser Asura
2016-05-08 14:36:18: continuumg created and commented on the card Lesser Asura

An uncommon for BR Raid Aggro. Skeleton was missing one.
2016-05-08 14:35:55: continuumg created and commented on a card
2016-05-08 14:30:02: continuumg commented on a card
2016-05-08 14:21:56: continuumg commented on a card
2016-05-08 14:14:01: continuumg commented on Lurking Crustacean

CARDNAME ETBs tapped.

When CARDNAME ETBs, it doesn't Untap during its controller's next Untap step.
2016-05-08 06:53:00: Inanimate commented on AEther Bolt

Flame Slash was considered very, very strong.
2016-05-08 06:51:16: Inanimate moved the card Disappearing Act from Tesla Project into Tesla Card Dump