Sienira's Facets: Recent Activity
| Sienira's Facets: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | The Facets Of Sienira | Keyword Mechanics | FAQ |
Recent updates to Sienira's Facets: (Generated at 2025-05-01 09:10:33)
Depends on the card. Nonsensical subtypes will cease to exist, so it'll still be a Mountain iff the other card says "in addition to its other types".
I think the wording is a little clunky, but not a problem. Perhaps "Choose one -- tap a permanent for each artifact you control; or untap a permanent for each artifact you control".
Or alternatively, "Tap or untap X target permanent controlled by the same player where X is the number of artefacts you control."
Depends on the card. Nonsensical subtypes will cease to exist, so it'll still be a Mountain iff the other card says "in addition to its other types".
Perhaps "Exile a sorcery card in defending player's graveyard: ~ can't be blocked this turn" if you want to keep the current stats, depending if this is better targetting players who EVER play sorceries, or players who play LOTS of sorceries.
I'd be happy to tone that down. Bladetusk Boar was fairly first-pickable, and this is less evasive (but slightly cheaper).
Depends on the card. Nonsensical subtypes will cease to exist, so it'll still be a Mountain iff the other card says "in addition to its other types".
Depends on the card. Nonsensical subtypes will cease to exist, so it'll still be a Mountain iff the other card says "in addition to its other types".
Well, on the one hand, I'm not particularly attached to this card. It was a hole-filling design for a common blue instant affiliated with artifacts. But on the other hand, I don't think the wording is a problem. What do others think?
Heh. I seem to remember that in Dwarf Week a few years back, Matt Cavotta argued that Dwarves should be white. I think white characters are allowed to have an angry temperament; compare with the Shadowmoor kithkin.
The abilities are straight off Forbidden Crypt, which I don't think was broken (even if it does evoke Yawgmoth's Agenda, which obviously was). If anything, this doesn't have quite enough going on to count as both an artifact and an enchantment.
Heh. I seem to remember that in Dwarf Week a few years back, Matt Cavotta argued that Dwarves should be white. I think white characters are allowed to have an angry temperament; compare with the Shadowmoor kithkin.
Compare with Stronghold Discipline (the players half, sorcery) and Psychotic Haze (the creatures half, instant).
There's no way you're allowed to put an ability that good on a body that efficient.
There's no way you're allowed to put an ability that good on a body that efficient.
The flavor text adds so much to this card; I sincerely hope it fits, with or without the first two words.
Really? But most (well, many) Shamans tap for mana or something anyway...
The flavor text adds so much to this card; I sincerely hope it fits, with or without the first two words.
Yeah, I think this card needs to be junked and redesigned. I liked the idea of a land that could animate into two different types, but with trying to make the enchantment feel enchantment-y, it got overly wordy and fiddly. And it's also too strong in an irritating way: if you leave 3 mana up, you can counter anything that tries to hit one of your enchantments, and if you have 9 mana up, you can even do that while still letting this itself dodge creature and enchantment removal. Needs redesigning.
I thought this seemed fine and balanced, and then I played against it. And realised that if you don't need your land drop, this is FREE. Owch. Needs changing.
I thought this seemed fine and balanced, and then I played against it. And realised that if you don't need your land drop, this is FREE. Owch. Needs changing.
Or indeed to use them at all. If anything they're too small for that drawback.
Yeah, this is actually unprintably strong for constructed. I need a different design for the blue uncommon land-hoser.
Or indeed to use them at all. If anything they're too small for that drawback.
Yeah, this seemed like the right way to do this card, strong but not overpowered (as it were). A random 3/3 blocker would need 3RRR to let this survive, so it's only really scary in mono-red.
Correction to me last comment. This is Silvercoat Lion + Suntail Hawk, but less mana intensive. I think 1WW common would probably be fair.
Correction to me last comment. This is Silvercoat Lion + Suntail Hawk, but less mana intensive. I think 1WW common would probably be fair.