Multiverse Design Challenge: Recent Activity

All challenges | Upcoming Challenges | Make a new design challenge! | All challenges (text)

Recent updates to Multiverse Design Challenge: (Generated at 2025-05-19 02:41:30)

2016-03-17 03:01:53: jmgariepy edited Ascendancy Engine
2016-03-17 02:59:07: jmgariepy edited Ascendancy Engine
2016-03-17 02:58:06: jmgariepy commented on Challenge # 147

Added Ascendancy Engine, using "win the game".

Let's see. How about I add "Remove [cardname] from your deck before playing if"
2016-03-17 02:53:44: jmgariepy commented on Ascendancy Engine

For Challenge # 147. It's a pity these can be exiled/sacrificed/bounced, but what can you do. I just figured that if someone was trying to win the game through superior resources, then everyone else she be allowed to play that game too.
2016-03-17 02:52:38: jmgariepy edited Ascendancy Engine
2016-03-17 02:51:32: jmgariepy created the card Ascendancy Engine
2016-03-17 02:35:17: jmgariepy commented on Challenge # 147

Ha! All Lord of the Labyrinth needs now is some rider text that reads "If you exhcange a Minotaur with another Minotaur, you win the game."
2016-03-16 19:36:15: Jack V commented on Lord of the Labyrinth

You made Goatnapper! Well, maybe not.

It's a great choice for a minotaur lord, a bit quirky. Potentially powerful, but only against bombs and only if you have enough minotaurs to stand off the other creatures and get exchanged...
2016-03-16 19:34:38: Jack V commented on Challenge # 147

LOL. Look at me not anticipating edge cases :) I think adding one replacement mechanic is the right thing to do.
2016-03-16 17:41:35: Alex commented on Challenge # 147
I apologise, I may have already broken the format a little... I created Lord of the Labyrinth :)

My extra phrase (to replace either "exchange" or "Minotaur") is:
- "return [something] to its owner's hand"
2016-03-16 17:38:35: Alex created and commented on the card Lord of the Labyrinth

Created for Challenge # 147. I felt I wanted more constraints, so I made something including "exchange" that also happens to include "Minotaur"... or perhaps something including "Minotaur" that also happens to include "exchange"? It would have been easy to add some implausible "win the game" condition too - perhaps your opponents control ten nontoken Minotaurs, like a mirror of Maze's End? But I felt that might be a step too far. :)
2016-03-16 15:09:48: Jack V edited the details page All challenges (text)
2016-03-16 15:09:29: Jack V edited the details page Front Page
2016-03-16 15:09:11: Jack V edited the details page All challenges
2016-03-16 15:08:09: Jack V created and commented on the card Challenge # 147
I like these, "respond to the previous poster" challenges, hopefully a few more variants on the theme will still be welcome.

Design a card incorporating a word or words specified by one of the approx three previous posters. Then leave a word or words for the next poster to use.

A few details:
- A single word, a phrase, or multiple words which must be used in any order are all fine.
- You can use the word/words on any part of the card, tho' most suggestions will only make sense in rules text.
Note: We're generally relaxed about specifying extra or fewer suggestions, but for this one challenge, I'd like to try to keep EXACTLY THREE suggestions on the go at once. I think trying to meet the restriction can produce simple but interesting cards that wouldn't otherwise be made. So try to:
- Not suggest extras, only suggest one new word/phrase per submission
- It's fine to make a duplicate card based on a previously-used suggested word/phrase, but don't suggest a new word.
- However, if it's been a day with no more answers, assume the previous words were too hard or not interesting enough, and feel free to suggest another one.
- If you answer a challenge but don't think of any new word, it's fine to say "and someone else can fill in a word".
- If there's an accidental double-answer both suggesting a new word/phrase, that's fine, don't delete the second one, but the next answer should not suggest one.
To start us off:
- "Exchange"
- "Minotaur"
- "Win the game"
2016-03-11 19:47:42: Link commented on Mokole-Mbembe

Ha! Dinosaur survivor. Cute.
2016-03-10 22:42:09: Sorrow commented on Challenge # 146

I used survivor. Samoset's Disciple, Mokole-Mbembe, Millenia Redwood, Truth of Mortality
2016-03-10 22:40:55: Sorrow created and commented on the card Samoset's Disciple

See Challenge # 146.
2016-03-10 22:37:43: Sorrow created and commented on the card Mokole-Mbembe

See Challenge # 146.
2016-03-10 22:32:49: Sorrow created and commented on the card Truth of Mortality

See Challenge # 146.
2016-03-10 22:29:09: Sorrow created and commented on the card Millenia Redwood

See Challenge # 146.

The branches can be really sharp.
2016-03-10 21:18:25: Link commented on Challenge # 146

I made Wraith's Armaments and Blackened Shakujō.
2016-03-10 21:18:01: Link edited Blackened Shakujō
2016-03-10 21:14:54: Link created and commented on the card Wraith's Armaments

See Cursed Sword and Challenge # 146.
2016-03-10 21:11:36: Link created and commented on the card Blackened Shakujō

See Cursed Sword and Challenge # 146.
2016-03-10 21:01:23: Link commented on Challenge # 022

I made Lae, Nexus of Trade.
2016-03-10 21:01:07: Link edited Everhome, the Shifting Realm:
Reworded
2016-03-10 20:59:33: Link created and commented on the card Lae, Nexus of Trade

See Challenge # 022. I was scrolling through the old challenges and I came across this one.
2016-03-10 20:56:46: Link commented on Form Echoer

Neat. :)
2016-03-10 20:50:15: Link commented on Challenge # 146

Yeah, I see now that this challenge may not have been the best idea. I tried to eliminate some of the legwork by displaying a few mechanics in my top comment, but it's still more work than the more successful challenges.