Multiverse Design Challenge: Recent Activity
Multiverse Design Challenge: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
All challenges | Upcoming Challenges | Make a new design challenge! | All challenges (text) |
Recent updates to Multiverse Design Challenge: (Generated at 2024-05-18 16:41:03)
It's an interesting question whether this is out of the colour pie. Smokestack and Possessed Portal can force players to sacrifice nonspecific permanents. Is it pie-breaking to let blue or black force the opponent to sac an artifact?
You definitely could go in that direction. There are lots of possible mashups of these two. I liked the way Pyrokinesis requires you to exile a red card from hand to ACC the red spell, so I thought I'd make the opponent exile a card from hand and care about its colour. 1 from hand + 3 from library would be very fiddly and asymmetric, but I think making them lose 2 cards from hand would be very harsh (Silent Specter).
Nice. I've always liked the War Beast, but never had a good reason to play him. It's too much of a draw back.
I'm somewhat surprised this design space hasn't been explored more. There's Desertion, Draining Whelk, and Overwhelming Intellect, as well as the sideways Gather Specimens and Spelljack. But creature spells have a pair of other convenient variables to read, power and toughness, that it makes sense to do something with.
I like it, but it feels like the card should exile 4 cards, then deal 1 damage to the opponent for each card that shares a color...
Could alternatively replace "deal 3 damage to that player" with "repeat this process", at which point it becomes a monoblack Specter.
I approve of the ACC. Some more harsh ACCs need to float around... it would keep a lot more games honest.
The return from graveyard as a cost is obviously the most interesting bit here. Perhaps that does need an upkeep restriction like in the source material, but perhaps not. It does cost 2 mana.
fix formatting
I have entered! My cards are: Femeref Despoiler, Advanced-in-Years Scout, War Chewer, Pyrolexis, Delirious Daze. I tried to make the names obvious where the mashup came from rather than giving them names more customised for their individual existence.
Hahaha!
Oh, good question. I hadn't realised when I first saw it. It doesn't fit the terms of the challenge, but it makes me think of something like this: :)
White Knight. 1W. ~'s power is equal to the number of plains you control, and its toughness is equal to the number of forests you control.
Green Knight. 1G. ~'s power is equal to the number of plains you control, and its toughness is equal to the number of forests you control.
Cerulean Knight. 1U. ~'s power is equal to the number of plains you control, and its toughness is equal to the number of forests you control.
Yellow Knight. 1R. ~'s power is equal to the number of plains you control, and its toughness is equal to the number of forests you control.
Grey Knight. 1B. ~'s power is equal to the number of plains you control, and its toughness is equal to the number of forests you control.
Yeah I wanted this challenge to be a challenge, will be interesting to see what people come up with.
The interesting problem here is that white and green get 2/2s for 1C with an advantage, but blue, red and black should only get a 2/2 for 1C if it has a drawback. Making the drawback and advantage reference each other is an intriguing and fun restriction.
That is pretty much the idea I had, make your cards and then submit a comment on the rules card linking your creations so there is a central repository to see all of them together.
I am totally up for this. But it is rather late at night, and I spent the day making 24(!) Mashup cards. Plus, I'm not sure what the best approach to this is. Would it be best to fill this editable 'set' with cards, then link to those cards in this thread? Perhaps it would be wisest if each challenge had only one rules card for the 'set', and the rest would be player submitted cards, again, all linked on the rule's cards thread?
Either way, I'm all over this.
This isn't meant as a competition, just an opportunity to see how we differ from each other in our design approach, and as a bit of fun.
I have opened the set so that anyone who is signed in can post/edit.
If you have a cool idea for a challenge, feel free to post it.
And finally a disclaimer: Any card created for a challenge remains the Intellectual Property of its creator and should not be used without their consent.
The List for this Challenge is:
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; .
For each card list which 2 you used to make it in the flavour text box.