Multiverse: My Universe, My Rules: Recent Activity

2011-07-13 13:31:12: Vitenka commented on Mirrorgate

I'll make it reminder text then. It's not obvious to me.

2011-07-13 13:13:40: cmeister2 commented on Mirrorgate

Really nice card. I think the "remove them from combat" line is superfluous (control changes on a creature already removes that creature from combat).

2011-07-13 13:09:32: Vitenka edited Group Mage

2011-07-13 13:08:23: Vitenka commented on Group Mage

That would make untap steps... crazy. Let's make it so :)

2011-07-13 13:06:54: Alex commented on Group Mage

Needs "Untapping an untapped unflipped permanent causes it to become tapped-and-flipped", and "Untapping an untapped flipped permanent causes it to become tapped-and-unflipped".

2011-07-13 13:06:25: Vitenka edited Group Mage

2011-07-13 13:06:05: Vitenka edited Group Mage

2011-07-13 13:05:41: Vitenka created the card Group Mage

2011-07-13 12:49:49: Alex commented on Be be

This could actually be an interesting uncommon in the second or third set of a block that's got a lot of flip cards in it.

2011-07-13 12:39:07: Vitenka edited Be be

2011-07-13 12:38:19: Vitenka commented on a card

2011-07-13 12:38:12: Vitenka edited Anything

2011-07-13 12:23:22: Vitenka edited Anything

2011-07-13 12:13:14: Vitenka edited Anything

2011-07-13 12:12:44: Vitenka edited Anything

2011-07-13 12:12:33: Vitenka created the card Anything

2011-07-13 12:09:38: Vitenka created the card Be be

2011-07-13 08:36:34: Vitenka commented on Mirrorgate

Not sure what to say except "I hear what you are saying, and disagree".

I wanted a bit of asymmetry in it, you still have to work a bit to get it. I also didn't want it swapping when it is attacking.

It probably is undercosted, since the symmetry is so breakable (even leaving aside 'creature blocks everything' effects)

2011-07-13 05:17:55: jmgariepy commented on Mirrorgate

I like the card, but it feels like it should be a 2/2 instead of a 1/3 Defender. If you didn't plan on attacking on the ground, your opponent gained no advantage from trading with this card. Meanwhile, both you and your opponent can attack freely with a 2/2. If the point of the card is to just grief your opponent, the 1/3 defender is better, but if you want both players to interact with each other, I think the 2/2 does the job better.

2011-07-12 12:32:45: Vitenka commented on Mirrorgate

I was most inspired by Bronze Tablet. Um, not that one. Similar one that just changes control for {5} .

2011-07-12 11:33:37: Alex commented on Mirrorgate

Goblin Cadets is the bad half of it. Charisma and Tolarian Entrancer are similar to the good half. Nice idea to combine the two - it does indeed seem natural, but I don't think it's been done.

2011-07-12 10:47:24: Vitenka commented on Mirrorgate

Has this been done?

2011-07-12 10:47:16: Vitenka created the card Mirrorgate

2011-07-09 21:52:14: Vitenka commented on War Monger

Mine's got a space in it :)

2011-07-09 19:54:16: jmgariepy commented on War Monger

I'm sorry to report that there already is a card named Warmonger. Though, the fact that you made your card a monger leaves me to suspect that you already knew thing...

2011-07-08 12:30:58: Vitenka edited War Monger

2011-07-08 12:30:44: Vitenka commented on War Monger

Well.. yeah, assuming you can't kill it on one of its attacks. You're right though.

2011-07-08 11:45:46: Jack V commented on War Monger

ROFL. That's pretty good. Having a combat phase within another player's turn would probably never see print, but I think it fits within the rules.

You may want to tap creatures that attack as well, else this is often a two-card win combo with 1-mana Lionheart Maverick.

2011-07-08 11:25:11: Vitenka commented on War Monger

I'm not sure they like the idea of an player getting a phase during another player's turn - but dammit, they probably should.

2011-07-08 11:24:05: Alex commented on War Monger

Wheeee. Funky. I wonder if the rules handle attacking creatures not controlled by the active player, and blocking creatures that are? Perhaps they do, actually.