Avoren Storage: Recent Activity

Mechanics | Possible Mechanics | Cycles

Recent updates to Avoren Storage: (Generated at 2026-03-15 21:06:28)

2013-08-26 00:53:12: Link edited Eralas
2013-08-26 00:52:56: Link edited Lyras
2013-08-26 00:52:47: Link edited Weilox
2013-08-25 20:59:23: Link edited Viara
2013-08-25 20:59:09: Link edited Viara
2013-08-25 19:30:17: Link edited the details page Cycles
2013-08-25 19:30:07: Link created the details page Cycles
2013-08-25 19:24:22: Link edited Eluvia, Principality of Progress
2013-08-25 19:23:20: Link edited Valos, Land of Conquest
2013-08-25 19:22:41: Link edited Aysai, Land of Permanence
2013-08-25 19:22:08: Link edited Zol, Isles of Anarchy
2013-08-25 19:21:15: Link edited Noctore, Seat of Power
2013-08-25 19:20:35: Link edited Ralia, Province of Promise:
Increased starting loyalty to 2.
2013-08-25 19:19:34: Link edited Nandes, Duchy of Dominance
2013-08-25 19:19:04: Link edited Tiaojan, Territory of Turmoil:
Increased starting loyalty to 2.
2013-08-25 19:17:32: Link edited Ator, Land of Law:
Increased starting loyalty to 2.
2013-08-25 19:14:02: Link edited Palden, State of Suffering
2013-08-21 04:58:49: Link commented on Secret Weapon

I need to either limit Subterfuge so that the spells can only be placed on creatures of the proper color, or make the lessening of the color commitment less complete.
2013-08-20 20:07:55: Vitenka (Unsigned) commented on Secret Weapon

Yeah, it needs something. "Destroy target creature", in artifact, for ? Crazy!

Ok, nonblack creature; but still.
2013-08-19 16:51:09: Alex commented on Secret Weapon

Depends what you mean by "on par with". Common can get widely-applicable removal (Trostani's Judgment, Launch Party), or cheap removal (Smite, Mugging), just not both on the same card.
2013-08-19 13:51:51: jmgariepy commented on Secret Weapon

"As long as you control a Swamp?" Hmm.
Maybe this mechanic should take a cue from Morph, and have a de-Subterfuge cost of .
Then again, looking at the cost and the subterfuge cost, it looked like having green-white decks subterfuge this was the whole point. I got to admit, it bugs me too.
Oh, one more thing, modern power levels might suggest this card is an uncommon. Removal on par with Dark Banishing isn't supposed to be common nowadays...
2013-08-19 11:38:20: Alex commented on Secret Weapon

I agree both that the current wording works ("cast" implies "put it onto the stack", which implies face-up unless specified otherwise) and that it'd be worth spelling it out explicitly anyway.

I assume all Subterfuge spells will have Subterfuge ? (As otherwise you could tell them apart by the cost paid.) Might it be worth moving the inside the keyword, like in morph?

Also, I note that a green-white or blue-red deck could happily subterfuge this card. That doesn't seem right.
2013-08-19 02:48:20: dude1818 commented on Secret Weapon

That's what I assumed. It should probably say "Whenever that creature attacks or blocks, you may reveal this card and cast it without paying its mana cost" just to be on the safe side.
2013-08-19 00:00:24: Link commented on Secret Weapon

The intent is that you reveal the spell, casting it from exile, and when it resolves, it goes to your graveyard.
2013-08-18 23:40:41: dude1818 commented on Secret Weapon

Once the creature attacks or blocks, do you flip this face-up and cast it once, so that it's no longer associated with the creature? Or is it instead an Illusionary Mask spell? "I destroy your creature." "How?" "With this spell that I don't need to show you."
2013-08-18 18:29:28: Link edited Secret Weapon
2013-08-18 18:29:19: Link commented on Secret Weapon

I know "under" isn't correct, but I need to think of a good verb for it.
2013-08-18 18:29:19: Link created the card Secret Weapon
2013-08-18 18:28:10: Link created a mechanic in Avoren Storage
2013-08-17 05:58:29: Link created the card Ancient Map