Various Fandoms: Recent Activity
| Various Fandoms: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics |
Recent updates to Various Fandoms: (Generated at 2026-02-13 18:54:21)
| Various Fandoms: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics |
Recent updates to Various Fandoms: (Generated at 2026-02-13 18:54:21)
Flavorfully A should only have one
in its casting cost, but 
would look really weird. This card is not supposed to be fair or balanced for the same reason that Urza isn't likely to see a black-bordered planeswalker card (aside from him being dead).
Well this kills Siege Rhino, which wasn't the intention, but I guess is a bonus.
That clears things up a bit and keeps what I was going for so thanks. A minor note, devil fruits can be applied to non-living things, so it's a small flavor fail that I haven't made ones that could enchant artifacts.
All damage dealt to this Aura? Should that be all damage dealt to enchanted creature?
Even if so, the moment when being indestructible matters isn't actually when the damage is dealt - it's for the rest of the turn until the damage wears off. I might suggest a wording like:
> Enchanted creature is indestructible.
to have enchanted creature lose indestructible UEOT.
> Whenever a source deals damage to enchanted creature, that source's controller may pay
Alternatively, template it like Knight of the Holy Nimbus.
Turning the Suna Suna no Mi's signature liquid drain ability into a red card was very hard. Since -X/-X isn't red I opted for damage and made it temporary. Still, this is very powerful. since the enchanted creature can just burn creatures till they get killed by by attackers' or blockers' power.
So I like this concept for Logia, though I'm certain it's misworded. I think paying additional mana is a good representation of busoshoku Haki. That said, I'm not super keen on this translation of mera mera no mi into card form.
Legendary for flavor purposes
But does the game know that those are the same ability, or not? The game knows that two creatures with vigilance share an ability, but there's no "tag" on the Twinblade Slasher ability for the game to latch onto... or am I think about this the wrong way?
not really an issue for this card, but I wanted to create a card real quick before class, and I thought about doing a logia fruit, but figuring out how to represent the intangibility seems a challenge at this moment.