| Various Fandoms: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics |
|
CardName: Mera Mera no Mi Cost: {5}{R}{R} Type: Legendary Enchantment - Fruit Arua Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: Enchant creature Logia (Enchanted creature is indestructible. Whenever a source deals damage to enchanted creature, that source's controller may pay {2} to have enchanted creature lose indestructible UEOT.) {R}: enchanted creature gets +1/+0 until end of turn. {4}{R}{R}: Enchanted creature deals X damage to each creature you don't control, where X is the enchanted creatures power. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Various Fandoms None
Mera Mera no Mi
  Enchant creature
Logia (Enchanted creature is indestructible. Whenever a source deals damage to enchanted creature, that source's controller may pay  to have enchanted creature lose indestructible UEOT.)
: enchanted creature gets +1/+0 until end of turn.
 : Enchanted creature deals X damage to each creature you don't control, where X is the enchanted creatures power. |
History: [-] Add your comments: |
So I like this concept for Logia, though I'm certain it's misworded. I think paying additional mana is a good representation of busoshoku Haki. That said, I'm not super keen on this translation of mera mera no mi into card form.
All damage dealt to this Aura? Should that be all damage dealt to enchanted creature?
Even if so, the moment when being indestructible matters isn't actually when the damage is dealt - it's for the rest of the turn until the damage wears off. I might suggest a wording like:
> Enchanted creature is indestructible.
to have enchanted creature lose indestructible UEOT.
> Whenever a source deals damage to enchanted creature, that source's controller may pay
Alternatively, template it like Knight of the Holy Nimbus.
That clears things up a bit and keeps what I was going for so thanks. A minor note, devil fruits can be applied to non-living things, so it's a small flavor fail that I haven't made ones that could enchant artifacts.