Various Fandoms: Recent Activity

Various Fandoms: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

Mechanics

Recent updates to Various Fandoms: (Generated at 2026-02-13 18:52:11)

• 2017-01-22 00:42:41: Sorrow created and commented on the card Wellpoisoner Snake

  See Electrocuting Ants.

• 2017-01-22 00:38:13: Sorrow created and commented on the card Electrocuting Ants

  See Hurricane Jelly.

• 2017-01-22 00:37:13: Sorrow edited Blizzard Lizard
• 2017-01-22 00:37:01: Sorrow created and commented on the card Hurricane Jelly

  See Blizzard Lizard.

• 2017-01-22 00:36:07: Sorrow created the card Blizzard Lizard
• 2016-11-30 03:24:25: Sorrow deleted the card Arya Stark from Various Fandoms
• 2016-11-30 03:01:34: Sorrow edited Arya Stark
• 2016-11-30 02:59:27: Sorrow created and commented on the card Danaerys, Mother of Dragons

  See Jon Snow, Lord Commander.

  The flavor of the first ability is her dragons burninging someone to death.

  The second ability is the Targaryen immunity to fire.

• 2016-11-30 02:49:00: Sorrow created and commented on the card Jon Snow, Lord Commander

  See Arya Stark.

  Doing these because someone challenged me.

• 2016-11-30 02:41:20: Sorrow created the card Arya Stark
• 2016-11-30 02:41:20: Sorrow created a card
• 2016-07-14 10:39:57: Sorrow created the card Hie Hie no Mi
• 2016-07-14 10:37:04: Sorrow created the card Goro Goro no Mi
• 2016-07-14 10:32:19: Sorrow edited Mera Mera no Mi
• 2016-07-14 10:31:17: Sorrow commented on Seastone Bullet

  Invulnerability seemed the most satisfying was to handle logia fruit's intangibility. Normally a source's controller could pay so to remove invulnerability. The payment of was to represent the use of haki in someone's attacks.

• 2016-07-14 09:27:54: Vitenka commented on Seastone Bullet

  You're kinda risking the whole "Regeneration! / Nuh uh!" thing they tried to simplify away from.

  Still, Indestructible DOES need answers.

• 2016-07-12 23:11:58: Sorrow created and commented on the card Seastone Bullet

  Had a heck of a time wording the logia clause. Flavorwise I'd think this card should do 2 damage at most (barring someone like Van Augur shooting the bullet), but Magic just makes me want three damage on a red instant.

• 2016-01-05 06:07:47: Sorrow edited Fiendfyre
• 2016-01-05 06:07:34: Sorrow commented on Fiendfyre

  Mechanically exile would be the simplest answer, but I'm not liking the flavorvibe for that choice in accomplishing the task. Also I don't want the damage to be optional; Fiendfyre (my error on previously having the name wrong) is a pretty scary spell. As for the amount of damage, Fiendfyre seemed to be dangerous and destructive on its own, so I don't like the damage dealt being based on the artifact that was destroyed. If you think the damage should be more or less suggest how much and if the cost should be altered. I can't see Fiendfyre doing less than 2 damage though.

• 2016-01-05 05:57:21: Sorrow commented on Doumeki

  I like Vitenka's suggestion most.

• 2016-01-05 05:57:04: Sorrow edited Doumeki
• 2016-01-05 03:46:07: jmgariepy commented on Doumeki

  One more alternative!

  "When ~ is blocking or blocked by an enchanted or equipped creature, it gains deathtouch until end of turn."

• 2016-01-04 14:55:55: Vitenka (unsigned) commented on Doumeki

  I tried to keyword this ability once, as stuff-bane. Which works fine for "Elf-bane" but "Enchanted-or-equipped-bane" is pretty horrible too.

  Maybe unpack the deathtouchiness of it?

  ~ deals lethal damage to equipped and enchanted creatures.

• 2016-01-04 14:50:48: Alex commented on Doumeki

  Hm. I like that last ability, but it's hard to understand (and hard to template).

  How about "~ deals damage to enchanted or equipped creatures as though ~ had deathtouch"?

• 2016-01-04 11:42:45: Jack V commented on Fiendfyre

  "Exile target artifact. If it was indestructible, deal damage equal to its CMC to all creatures"?

• 2016-01-04 09:21:12: Vitenka (unsigned) commented on Fiendfyre

  Aww, I can see why it's more useful this way; but it really feels like this should be something like "destroy target indestructible artifact, it deals damage equal to its casting cost to all creatures".

  (Said wording doesn't even work; though it should)

• 2016-01-01 23:37:22: Sorrow edited Fiendfyre
• 2015-12-28 05:28:02: Sorrow edited Hito Hito no Mi: Model Diabutsu
• 2015-12-28 05:27:21: Sorrow edited Doumeki:

  added reach

• 2015-07-21 03:53:40: Sorrow created and commented on the card Salem, a Servant

  ­ is here for mechanical purposes to match the flavor of the character's goal rather than as a reflection of his personality. Salem is definitely WB, but positive land interaction is a green thing, so that ended up on there.