Multiverse Feedback: Recent Activity
| Multiverse Feedback: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Upcoming releases | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Multiverse Feedback: (Generated at 2025-05-12 18:20:00)
The watermark list already includes a "Custom" option. Just find the URL for a big C symbol (e.g. this one) and paste it into the text box that appears when you select "Custom".
If that particular image doesn't quite fit your needs, you can easily edit it and upload your tweaks to any old image host like imgur.
Mmm. Yes. I've not been editing Multiverse much at all recently (you guys might have noticed), but the frame for those is dramatically different so there's not a great solution for doing them at the moment.
I worry a bit that Throne of Eldraine's new storybook frame indicates that Wizards are wanting to do more and more of these wacky funky frames going forward, which is awesome except that it's some effort to arrange my CSS to mimic them all :)
I'll try to find some time to put in a Sagas frame. It can probably work like the planeswalker frames do, so it ought to be easier than Level-Up Cards which I'd also like to do but would be rather harder.
Man this is illuminating. Oh wait im pileupping.. damn my human nature
Cool. I havent been posting cus my computer is broken and i hate websites on mobile internet.
Nice, thanks!
> Maybe just random card from set?
As I point out in the linked Conversation up there, I usually draw a booster - it's only active cards and some sets randomly have all their cards inactive, but that's something the set creator does to themself.
That said a side-wide "recent activity" would still be nice as requested elsewhere as well.
Yeah. For small sets, I'll sometimes go through and try to come up with some comment on everything; but it's tricky.
Perhaps there could be a link for a "random uncommented card in this set" in the navigation stuff up top?
...ah, create&comment fights against that. Maybe just random card from set?
Or accept that "no comments" is an implicit "Yeah, this is ok; not great, but ok"
Haha! I was waiting for that comment!
Yeah, Thunder Spirit is probably the worst card to put on the Reserved List, in that it's the exact power level and kind of effect they probably wanted to use several times since
I feel you. Maybe this'll help: Feedback Request.
True! This isn't just a Multiverse problem; it's a human nature problem. In your average classroom, the A+ students are rewarded, the F students are either berated or supported, and the B- students are ignored. That doesn't make it right. But it sure can be hard fighting human nature.
That said, I do think this is a Multiverse problem. Because when we're looking through 'Recent Update', we only see the most recent update of one card in each set. This often leads to a pig pile of comments. Something stuck out to one person, and now this one card has a tremendous amount of action dedicated towards it, while the other 10 cards that were designed that day are set to pasture.
So, yes, it behooves all of us to seek out other cards a designer designed. But as soon as we start commenting on another card... even a mediocre card... there will probably be a pile-on. And if the card is mediocre, the pile-on probably won't be about the card itself, but the mechanic in general, which is arguably even less useful to the original creator.
Unfortunately, the only thing that could solve this problem is a complete restructure of the 'Recent Updates' page. I presume that would be hard. And I presume Alex has other things that he thinks would be a more important use of his resources. But if he's interested in a restructure, then so am I.
As an alternative, maybe there could be an easy to access page for cards with no comments (besides the original author's comments.) Possibly showing you one random card at a time, so that the potential commenter is encouraged to focus on cards at random, irregardless of whether they have obvious problems or obvious greatness. I know that if you sat me down and randomly exposed me to even the most benign card... let's say Thunder Spirit... I'd be full of opinions. I'm sure others are the same way.
Interesting.
Awesome
Contact successfully established. Feyd_Ruin is friendly, and both he and I are interested in seeing how we can collaborate to serve the custom card(set) creation needs of both communities together. Sounds good!
Hmm. Yes, this ought to be possible.
For the moment you can always override which frame a card uses by selecting from the "Frame:" dropdown at the top. That allows you to make any card use the token frame no matter what its rarity or (super)types.
I think you can do this with the "Import data" option, which is generally the way to do mass edits to a cardset. Something like this should work:
Formatting line: name%code
Data:
card name 1%
card name 2%
card name 3%
Oooh. Thank you. I'll get in touch.
Feyd_Ruin wrote:
> "I'm beginning the planning stages of our upcoming CCC site area. The concept would be similar to MagicMultiverse with custom card pages, card renders, custom set pages, etc. For every area we expand into, we look to similar sites to see if there's a way to partner and/or collaborate so that we can grow together and support each other rather than compete."
I directed them to your contact info on this site, but if your active on MTGNexus and interested (and they haven't come around to contacting you yet), you may want to message Feyd_Ruin over there.
Mock-ups are usually linked with their cardname, but if I want to get to the card page of a card given as image I need to go over e. g. the Cardlist, Visual Spoiler or Search function.
Check out e. g. reprints here.
Ah, OK, it looks like the unaddressed state is visible to anyone who has permissions to create cards in a set. Which is every signed-in user, for this set, and for Xerex, among others.
Uh? I'm not admin of this set; and I see the unaddressed state of your above comment? I do see the toggle option, though. It also seems to work for me on, say, your set "Xerex, The Planar Labyrinth"
I also like this system; it's vbery helpful for me on my less-active sets to go back and collate a bunch of comments in one go next time I go back to give the set some more love. Though personally I tend to use the yellow-highlight option for my own todo-list.