Multiverse Feedback: Recent Activity
| Multiverse Feedback: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Upcoming releases | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Multiverse Feedback: (Generated at 2025-09-03 05:30:03)
In this case the reminder text is pretty close, but in some cases (such as Scry 1 vs Scry >1) the reminder text is massively divergent, far more so than just some PLURALISE(N, "+1/+1 counter") algorithm would handle. So it makes sense to have the 1 / N versions for some mechanics, at which point I think it makes sense to have them for all numeric mechanics.
The slight issue is that making it a variable leads to "put one counter" instead of "put a counter." MSE is smart enough to correct for that, but I can understand Alex not wanting to spend the time writing that code
I guess trying to automate it, would end up with +a/+a counters.
As with most mechanics with a numeric parameter, now there are two versions, "Fabricate1" and "Fabricate [N]".
You don't think Marionette Master should get a +3/+3 counter? ...Fine, I'll fix it :)
That's amazing
Is incorrect.
The watermark list already includes a "Custom" option. Just find the URL for a big C symbol (e.g. this one) and paste it into the text box that appears when you select "Custom".
If that particular image doesn't quite fit your needs, you can easily edit it and upload your tweaks to any old image host like imgur.
Mmm. Yes. I've not been editing Multiverse much at all recently (you guys might have noticed), but the frame for those is dramatically different so there's not a great solution for doing them at the moment.
I worry a bit that Throne of Eldraine's new storybook frame indicates that Wizards are wanting to do more and more of these wacky funky frames going forward, which is awesome except that it's some effort to arrange my CSS to mimic them all :)
I'll try to find some time to put in a Sagas frame. It can probably work like the planeswalker frames do, so it ought to be easier than Level-Up Cards which I'd also like to do but would be rather harder.
Man this is illuminating. Oh wait im pileupping.. damn my human nature
Cool. I havent been posting cus my computer is broken and i hate websites on mobile internet.
Nice, thanks!
> Maybe just random card from set?
As I point out in the linked Conversation up there, I usually draw a booster - it's only active cards and some sets randomly have all their cards inactive, but that's something the set creator does to themself.
That said a side-wide "recent activity" would still be nice as requested elsewhere as well.
Yeah. For small sets, I'll sometimes go through and try to come up with some comment on everything; but it's tricky.
Perhaps there could be a link for a "random uncommented card in this set" in the navigation stuff up top?
...ah, create&comment fights against that. Maybe just random card from set?
Or accept that "no comments" is an implicit "Yeah, this is ok; not great, but ok"
Haha! I was waiting for that comment!
Yeah, Thunder Spirit is probably the worst card to put on the Reserved List, in that it's the exact power level and kind of effect they probably wanted to use several times since
I feel you. Maybe this'll help: Feedback Request.
True! This isn't just a Multiverse problem; it's a human nature problem. In your average classroom, the A+ students are rewarded, the F students are either berated or supported, and the B- students are ignored. That doesn't make it right. But it sure can be hard fighting human nature.
That said, I do think this is a Multiverse problem. Because when we're looking through 'Recent Update', we only see the most recent update of one card in each set. This often leads to a pig pile of comments. Something stuck out to one person, and now this one card has a tremendous amount of action dedicated towards it, while the other 10 cards that were designed that day are set to pasture.
So, yes, it behooves all of us to seek out other cards a designer designed. But as soon as we start commenting on another card... even a mediocre card... there will probably be a pile-on. And if the card is mediocre, the pile-on probably won't be about the card itself, but the mechanic in general, which is arguably even less useful to the original creator.
Unfortunately, the only thing that could solve this problem is a complete restructure of the 'Recent Updates' page. I presume that would be hard. And I presume Alex has other things that he thinks would be a more important use of his resources. But if he's interested in a restructure, then so am I.
As an alternative, maybe there could be an easy to access page for cards with no comments (besides the original author's comments.) Possibly showing you one random card at a time, so that the potential commenter is encouraged to focus on cards at random, irregardless of whether they have obvious problems or obvious greatness. I know that if you sat me down and randomly exposed me to even the most benign card... let's say Thunder Spirit... I'd be full of opinions. I'm sure others are the same way.
Interesting.
Awesome
Contact successfully established. Feyd_Ruin is friendly, and both he and I are interested in seeing how we can collaborate to serve the custom card(set) creation needs of both communities together. Sounds good!
Hmm. Yes, this ought to be possible.
For the moment you can always override which frame a card uses by selecting from the "Frame:" dropdown at the top. That allows you to make any card use the token frame no matter what its rarity or (super)types.