Link's Unplaced Cards: Recent Activity
| Link's Unplaced Cards: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics |
Recent updates to Link's Unplaced Cards: (Generated at 2026-05-01 05:50:41)
| Link's Unplaced Cards: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics |
Recent updates to Link's Unplaced Cards: (Generated at 2026-05-01 05:50:41)
Decreased Cost
One side for + abilities, one side for minuses? Nifty.
"Permanent" was in the wrong place. I doubt there will ever be a nonpermanent legendary cars, but I might as well play it safe.
And actually, it's pretty similar to Fog Bank, too.
It's not that different from Guard Gomazoa, though it probably should cost the same.
An (effectively) unkillable flying wall, this cheap, is quite the statement.
That statement being "There is no more combat, forget about it."
Do you really mean to make that statement?
Huh. Isn't it.
Yeah, I guess given Hindering Light this could go down to just costing
.
Well, this is now significantly worse than Render Silent.
I do think this would be neat as a 2/4 with double strike, Vitenka, but I worry that it would ruin (what I see as) the attractiveness of the rules text with the flavor.
I thought it was cute because it has two abilities from each color. Normally white is the color that's able to block additional creatures.
Two-Headed Giant of Foriys was first; but it didn't get the "Needs to be double-blocked part".
Might work even better as a 2/2 double-strike?
Kinda strange having two creatures on a card when combined with equipment - but then, there's cards that are swarms of insects, so clearly that's not a blocking issue. (Boom boom)
Two-Headed Dragon reconcepted as a pair of warrior twins? Why not?
Oh... Yes. I wasn't really thinking about those things.
Turns out my
cost ability wouldn't count for the challenge, so I've decided to go with the ability in my first comment. It's incredibly wordy, though.