Multiverse: Link's Unplaced Cards: Recent Activity

2019-04-08 16:17:57: Link edited Athernon, World-Sculptor

2019-04-08 16:02:15: Link edited Lorel, Transformationist

2019-04-08 16:01:57: Link edited Lorel, Transformationist:

Previously ensured that the revealed card matched the tucked card's permanent type.

2019-04-05 14:41:32: Link edited Chell, Kestrel Farwalker

2019-04-05 14:38:50: Link edited Soulcaller

2019-04-05 03:35:19: Link edited Questioner Imrahim

2019-04-04 14:09:15: Link edited a mechanic in Link's Unplaced Cards

2019-04-04 14:08:42: Link edited a mechanic in Link's Unplaced Cards

2019-04-04 14:08:07: Link commented on Emerald Orchard

{A} represents assigning a creature/worker to an action space. I haven't yet decided on exactly how that's done.

2018-09-02 11:07:42: SecretInfiltrator commented on Emerald Orchard

How does one pay {a}? This seems to be the only consruction card in the set.

2018-08-15 13:17:59: Link commented on Narblegab, All-Consuming

I've begun writing the story of the character whose concept began with these cards. You can read it here.

2018-08-15 13:15:28: Link edited Narblegab's Beckoning

2018-01-27 20:51:26: Link created the card Emerald Orchard

2018-01-09 21:33:28: Link created the card Dr. Angela Ziegler

2017-10-07 12:37:09: Link edited Overbearing Administrator

2017-10-07 11:59:29: Link created the card Overbearing Administrator

2017-10-07 11:56:36: Link commented on Defender of Sanctity

Nothing. I made this right before I fell asleep and I probably clicked "related to this one" instead of"New Card."

2017-10-07 07:05:50: SecretInfiltrator commented on Defender of Sanctity

I don't see what this has to do with Priest of Ordinance

2017-10-07 02:10:19: Link edited Defender of Sanctity

2017-10-07 02:09:41: Link created and commented on the card Defender of Sanctity

See Priest of Ordinance.

2017-10-07 02:06:31: Link commented on Priest of Ordinance

See ((C85711)) and ((C85692)).

I'm on a rules-setting kick, I guess.

2017-10-07 02:03:48: Link commented on Ba Tsao, Turner of Heads

Thanks, Jack.

That sounds interesting, but bizarre.

2017-10-07 02:00:01: Link created the card Priest of Ordinance

2017-10-06 16:26:24: Link created the card Hazid's Apprentice

2017-10-06 10:35:46: Jack V commented on Ba Tsao, Turner of Heads

Oh yes, I'm sure I've seen this before but now the abilities are really nicely symmetric it's a really lovely design.

I wonder if anyone's ever tried to make Reflective Magic where both players share one deck, hand, and set of permanents...

2017-10-06 09:59:11: Link commented on Ba Tsao, Turner of Heads

Thank you for the compliment. This is one of my favorite custom cards.

Looking back, if I desired to change anything about it, the white ability would become "Target creature can't attack target player or planeswalker this turn," but that loses a bit of the elegance.

2017-10-06 05:40:27: WOM Devign Team commented on Ba Tsao, Turner of Heads

This card is really cool, and I think the rules for the last ability are actually not that bad. The Aura was change part of 9th Edition by the way, and the card I know of that's most affected is Tallowisp -- it used to be able to grab e.g. Threads of Disloyalty, but became unable to after the rules change.

--CF

2017-10-04 20:20:05: Link edited Ba Tsao, Turner of Heads:

Reduced cost by {1} .

2017-10-04 14:45:47: Link created and commented on the card Mangrove Treefolk

See Algae Creeper.

2017-06-15 03:01:18: jmgariepy commented on Ia, the Wandering Sea

I also wonder if the loyalties on these are much too low. I mean, you could kill a land with a Lightning Strike the round it enters the battlefield. That's rather disheartening.

I know that's supposed to be part of the drawback. But Choronda also has the drawback of the mana only coming at Sorcery speed. That should be enough of a restriction to allow you to bump the starting loyalty to something like four or five. If a person knocked my Planeswalker/Land off the battlefield with a Lava Axe, I'd probably say "Fair enough."

When I first saw Ia, I thought the tap ability was part of the first Loyalty ability. I wonder if that makes for a more interesting card? It couldn't be a powerful ability, true. Ia protects itself, but doesn't necessarily do anything for you, so that's why I thought it was okay. But maybe something like...

[+1] Add {u} to your mana pool. Look at the second card of your library. You may put that card back, or put it on top of your library.

The mana is still restricted to sorcery speed, and it can still be knocked off the table like a planeswalker, so it still seems balanced to me. An alternative:

[+1] Add {g} to your mana pool. You may only use this mana to cast creatures. Gain 1 life.

I don't know. I'm just spitballing.