Multiverse Design Challenge: Recent Activity
Multiverse Design Challenge: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
All challenges | Upcoming Challenges | Make a new design challenge! | All challenges (text) |
Recent updates to Multiverse Design Challenge: (Generated at 2025-05-24 15:28:58)
Here are the cards for the Mashup.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, ![[[Proteus Machine]]](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/named?format=image&version=normal&exact=proteus+machine)
Oh yes, I totally missed that too, which shows how appropriate it was.
I guess it's most broken with something like Solitary Confinement or Glacial Chasm which become "During opponent's turn, (you have shroud / creatures can't attack you) and prevent all damage to you" which isn't perfect, but is a complete lock if they don't have the right artifact/enchantment removal.
Oh. Wow. Yes. Straight into a Stax deck along with Braids, Cabal Minion or Smokestack. Yikes. Nicely done!
It does work well with things like Gilded Drake, but I also intended it to work with things like Dreamborn Muse, Braids, Conjurer Adept, and other such things you may only want to trigger during certain upkeeps.
This one kind of boggled me when it popped, too. Perhaps Link is anticipating an environment where Switcheroo becomes a format defining card. Maybe he just wants to set this up with Puca's Mischief, which is very unfair once you've lost tempo.
I made a quick Gatherer search for "Target opponent gains control" and came up with some interesting cards, but I'm pretty sure they aren't the sort of ideas that Link has. I have to admit, though, that this would only take one strong card to break it. A reprinted Avarice Totem, or a creature that kept insisting that it needed to go to its opponent's side of the battlefield. You know, like Karona, False God, but with proper timing.
Hmm. Wording looks a little odd: you can effectively set up two of your permanents to be in antiphase. But it doesn't seem obviously evil. It'd be good if there were a lot of control-switching effects, or some such, but I can't think of a format with that. So I can't quite see what mischief Link is up to here...
Yeah, it's awesome we can get some examples where it's not obvious, but in retrospect is obviously broken.
Classy, Alex. I just thought the card was moderately too good...
Indeed - well done! I was thinking to deliberately make something that'd be easy to throw into any deck with a Sun Titan and would go moderately degenerate. It's not worse than Splinter Twin-Deceiver Exarch, but that was pretty format-warping itself.
I don't think "~ is broken if you combo with the titans" implies that ~ is broken. But.
Ohhh, Sun Titan. Yes, this is sick.
I'm presuming there's something that brings a creature back from the dead when you attack, but I don't know what it is.
What happened two years ago that makes this sick and wrong, especially in white? Eldrazi?
I tried again with Farcaster as a sort of tweak on Conjurer's Closet.
For Challenge # 052.
Time Spiral is a broken card to begin with. It already has a number of enablers. Time Stop every turn, however, is a hard lock against some decks, and was reprinted in Tenth Edition. that being the case, yeah... that and/or Memory Jar would be pretty insane.
Edit: Holy! Memory Jar doesn't exile itself? What the 7I&$ were they thinking?
Time Stop "works," but the card you're looking for is Time Spiral.
Ah! Sorry, yes, you're right, that's quite a good interaction, two supposed safety-mechanisms interacting to make a powerful spell recurse as many times as you want.
Oh, no, I was doing it the right way in my head. The idea was that the spell would keep exiling itself on resolution because what it did was too powerful to keep kicking around. Make Your Own Luck would just use the fact that it exiled again and again and again to it's benefit.
Want an example? How about Time Stop. If you wanted to be a little more (questionably) fair, you might use Diminishing Returns (though, I admit, that card's a bit too old to worry about).
Ah, I see! Yes, I think that is a really good, idea, but I don't think that's what the wording on this card does. I think "cast from exile" is just the normal wording meaning "from exile, put it on the stack, then it goes to the owner's graveyard as normal"? I think to cast it repeatedly you need the "copy it, you may cast the copy" wording which wouldn't be out of place, although it might be harder to make the oversight look like a place.
Then it's a bit like Panoptic Mirror, except that you have to pay every time, but get a lot more flexibility.
Ug! Hoisted on my own petard! Yes, the card should read 'player' not 'opponent', and you get a prize for seeing through the Murky Rosewater card to find the Evil Rosewater card behind it.
Both, but my big dig was the ability to cast the same exiled sorcery or instant over and over again, if it exiled itself. Oh, and at instant speed doesn't hurt.
Funny thing is, it's true, this is only 'theoretically broken', in of the fact that it does a bunch of things it shouldn't be doing for much cheaper than should be happening. But would the card even crack standard? Yes.. oh, yes it would. But would that break the environment... I couldn't say.
I do know that part of my comparison to Temporal Aperture was a bit of Evil Mark Rosewater slight of hand. Temp. Ap. isn't a fair card... it only seems fair when compared to the rest of the Urza Block. How much would you pay to draw a card? Jayemdae Tome is too expensive, sure, but that's one heck of a discount.