Multiverse Design Challenge: Recent Activity

Multiverse Design Challenge: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity
All challenges | Upcoming Challenges | Make a new design challenge! | All challenges (text)

Recent updates to Multiverse Design Challenge: (Generated at 2025-07-07 13:34:55)

  • 2013-01-19 05:59:47: jmgariepy created the card Collaboration
  • 2013-01-19 05:53:34: jmgariepy commented on Eternal Reincarnation

    I kind of like this card. Though, the more I think about it, the more likely I would be to play with Fool's Demise... this is one of those cases where speed isn't more important than being able to reliably cast the spell (granted, I know this is an enchant permanent... I just assume I'm probably going to put it on a creature anyway). Funny how blue happens to be the one color you aren't using.

  • 2013-01-19 05:25:28: Link commented on Challenge # 064
  • 2013-01-19 05:23:01: Link commented on Omnipresence

    For Challenge # 064. Bam.

  • 2013-01-19 05:22:34: Link created the card Omnipresence
  • 2013-01-19 05:20:04: Link edited Day of Darkest Shadow:

    Added trample. Why not?

  • 2013-01-19 05:18:35: Link commented on Parasitic Abundance

    I find it pleasing that the {1} replaces the white mana symbol.

  • 2013-01-19 05:16:40: Link edited Eternal Reincarnation
  • 2013-01-19 05:16:15: Link commented on Eternal Reincarnation

    For Challenge # 064. I don't think this is my best four-color design, because I went about it the wrong way. Instead of thinking deeply about the colors, I only thought about the fact that I wanted to try to make a four-color aura. I think this could easily trade red for blue, although I do think red is a slightly better choice.

  • 2013-01-19 05:14:30: Link created the card Eternal Reincarnation
  • 2013-01-18 19:27:20: Visitor commented on Common nongreen creature

    Yeah, its close, but too far the other way; not so long ago NO colour got 1CMC 1/1 flying. 1B and 1R 1/1s are a bit too bad, but are printed occasionally. B and R ones are too good, but maybe we'll see them eventujally.

    Jack.

  • 2013-01-18 18:46:02: Chris commented on Common nongreen creature

    I was wondering if just (?) for a 1/1 flyer would work; but Bog Imp says no.

  • 2013-01-18 18:43:00: Link edited the details page Upcoming Challenges
  • 2013-01-18 18:42:48: Link edited the details page Upcoming Challenges
  • 2013-01-18 18:41:05: Link edited the details page All challenges
  • 2013-01-18 17:54:35: Jack V commented on Common nongreen creature

    Yeah, it's a shame the really simple creature is below curve, I really want something that can be the iconic anti-grizzly-bears. But {1}{?} 2/1 flying is still too good. Is there any way simple version which would fit a reasonable curve (even though UW is better than BR).

  • 2013-01-18 17:50:16: Jack V commented on Common nongreen creature

    Oh, good idea on removal. How about "Target creature gets +1/-1. If it would die this turn, you may put it on top of it's owner's library instead?" That way it can either be a kill spell that sets back the opponent, or a pump spell that gives you another use of a good creature.

    Or maybe that two-mode spell is too complicated. The trouble is, WUBR all mess with creatures somehow, but there's almost nothing they all do.

    See other cardsets