Fetish Wars: Recent Activity
| Fetish Wars: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Fetish Wars: (Generated at 2026-11-14 17:33:29)
| Fetish Wars: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Fetish Wars: (Generated at 2026-11-14 17:33:29)
This seems a bit overtuned to what we have gotten in the past. See Dissenter's Deliverance and Smash for example - and Smash is very decently rated overall afaik. Shredded Sails and Topple the Statue might indicate this sort of stuff is plausible though it being also hybrid is really sketchy to me at least.
Is there are need for artifact removal at common in your set, where it's both extremely mana effective and flexible? Often the case in mtg sets is where WotC wants to showcase a card type, like enchantments in Theros and artifacts in mirrodin sets, that they might even make the corresponding removal for those card types actually weaker than usual.
2R/W to 1R/W
added once each turn
omitted nonland and 3
to 
{W
In another set, I added actor, artist, and musician as types. Since a card references the musician type, I just thought I'd update this card. I feel those professions are distinct enough to each warrant their own class type (I also used dancer, though I already used dancer in a previous set). Also, currently I anticipate that most creatures in the set would have one of those professions as their class type. Seeing just artist on a third or so of the creatures in the set wouldn't be a good look for the set as a whole imho.
Could it be generalized to Artist? Do you feel Musicians / Artists lack representation in Magic?
Added musician type, retained original types as well
Elite Vanguard is now blue? The power creep is real.
increased power from 2 to 3.
Do you have any suggestions to fix the AP-NAP concerns?
Fetish as a mechanic has the problem that players need to concern themselves with AP-NAP order of resolving triggered abilities and get some nonintuitive results. I like the concept though and it looks like it could be made quite simple.
"each upkeep" to "each player's upkeep" and "each player" to "that player"
"first time" to "first time each turn." It was always intended to be first time each turn, but I forgot to include that in the text.
2 life to 3 life.
increased cost by
art was in wrong spot
Increase toughness from 2 to 3.
2/3 for

to 1/2 for 
. The card's ability remains the same.
Suid or swine would be a better term, but I think boar can fit here? I'm worried if boar should only be animal we know as the Eurasian wild boar (and its subspecies), and a more broad term should be used. I now am unsure if peccaries should use the boar type (I may have to go back to Coaxkika and Spectrum of the Storm) and give peccary its own type.
Still, this isn't as bad as the mess that are canidae of South America.
Pig type changed to boar. It's supposed to be a warthog. I don't know if warthogs should get their own creature type. Creature types are a mess imo anyway.
Followed SecretInfiltrator's suggestion.
More standardized wording: "When ~ enters the battlefield, if there is a creature card in your graveyard, you may gain 3 life."
Actually, with all the fours already floating around the card, I would go for "4 life".
Reduced checking creatures in graveyard from 3 to 1.
The effect could not be mandatory, yeah. There's also no point in restricting the type of counter- that was the whole reason I worded blemish as I did. This card needs to be a hybrid though, and I don't think green gets to bounce opponents' creatures. Further, I think that bouncing an opponent's creature with the potential to draw would be pretty strong.
Added mana to the activation cost. Currently at two hybrid
.
No, this doesn't want to remove counters. But yeah, the ability is kind of bonkers and could probably use mana in the activation cost.
Your comment on Vengeful Murdered suggests the activated ability wants to remove counters, right?
Either way the ease of abuse of counters in this set means that I suggest adding a small mana cost to the activated ability.
+, -s
Even if a drawback is abusable, it's a drawback. In this case this clearly makes multiple copies of the card undesirable - and 1 toughness in general.
I would say the ability is better suited for a larger body efficient uncommon.
Are you certain about Hexeater Troll Could it be you wanted the activation cost on that one to be something different?