My Universe, My Rules: Recent Activity
| My Universe, My Rules: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Recent updates to My Universe, My Rules: (Generated at 2026-04-30 00:46:51)
| My Universe, My Rules: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Recent updates to My Universe, My Rules: (Generated at 2026-04-30 00:46:51)
Nice. An Eternal Dominion that you can sacrifice. May be a bit undercosted: it's basically Followed Footsteps but better in two ways (not restricted to one creature, and doesn't die if the enchanted creature dies) and only worse in one (can't copy tokens). But still, fun card.
I think the ability should be worded:
> At the beginning of your upkeep, put a token that's a copy of target nonlegendary nontoken creature onto the battlefield.
Hm. The rules on counters don't seem to explicitly say counters have to be only one sort of counter. I think either way could work; they would presumably clarify the rules if it ever mattered (although it would make sense to assume that counters are only one type, I'm not sure if that's implied anywhere else in the rules).
Because I wanted this to simplify (or confusificate, whichever) counters forever!
If it's to simplify, then it should probably also add "Whenever something looks for a specific type of counter, any type of counter will do", which would almost certainly have been a better way of starting this idea. Although I think it would also mean +1/+1 could self annihilate any time you got a pair of them.
Forgot the emblem bit :) Fixing.
Instructions on sorceries are followed in order, so charge counters would indeed win out.
Speaking of which...why is this a sorcery?
Cinder Elemental, a teaser for an upnposted challenge.
The text actually works (well, not the minimalist "
:
", but that's another story). ETB tapped is just a replacement effect, like "ETB with four +1/+1 counters" or "ETB as a copy of a creature of your choice", and so then would this text. With multiple replacements applying to the same thing you control, you can arrange them in the order you like, to get the desired result.
I don't think the text works either. "When this land enters the battlefield tapped, untap it." works fine, but might kill the joke.
Oh yeah, this would be stupidly strong if it were either "Basic Land" or "Land - Forest". (This is all assuming that text works, of course. I'm not sure whether or not it does.)
I was mainly annoyed at the pre-eminence of "~ETBs tapped" as a fix for funny-lands.
And, I guess you are allowed to make cards slightly better than vanilla. Snow-Covered Forest, for 1example.
this would, presumably, be really quite nasty if it were ALSO basic, since then you could Kodama's it untapped (and other similar things)
Yes, nice. Sapphire Medallion is a fantastic candidate for the
artifact->land conversion.
Hmmm. It's not really actually much better than Forest. Presumably the intention is for this to override "put onto the battlefield tapped", but actually virtually none of those apply to generic land cards: only Loam Dweller and Primeval Titan as far as I can tell. And, well, you've probably got better things to search up with the Titan ;)
I appreciate the name. I've previously had the Magic card generator create lands with "
: Add 
" which I've named "Is Land", but I never thought of this one :)
Annoyingly, I already gave blue the best mana acceleration in my dorf set; and so I don't want to put this there.
But this is nice. You can't use it for
, you can't use it for abilities.
But you can use it multiple times a turn.
Probably balances out, and works really nicely multiple times.
I like it. It should probably a replacement effect, though. Other than the fact that this is strictly better than Forest, it could actually be printed!
Because.
Hmm, the frame on this is an interesting choice. It's either a mono-blue card or a blue-black gold card... so blue-black hybrid is a reasonable guess, I suppose. I didn't actually consider this circumstance, but I chose the algorithm to end up here if you'd given this the cost
, which is the kind of cost some people like, and I guess the reasoning applies in this case too.
Wording: "Search target spell's owner's hand and library for any number of cards with the same name as that spell. Put those cards into that player's graveyard. Then that player shuffles his or her library."
It's no counterspell, and thinking about it, most variations on this work on spells that have gone to the graveyard. But since not all do, this.
He wanted to be able to use this to counter a spell, by having rules text "A player discards a card". I.e. he wanted to be able to use mana ability rules to do this in the middle of someone else announcing/casting a spell. That's what doesn't work.
Wait. You're absolutely correct. I'm easily mislead.
In that case you just lose.
Simple enough to change. Make the card read "You simultaneously win and lose the game." It should work fine then.