Clockwork Wings: Recent Activity

Recent updates to Clockwork Wings: (Generated at 2025-05-01 12:19:22)

• 2011-02-02 12:33:50: Alex edited Piston-Wing Bat
• 2011-02-02 12:33:42: Alex created the card Piston-Wing Bat
• 2011-02-02 12:33:10: Alex edited Brass Crow
• 2011-02-01 18:08:13: Alex edited the details page Decklists
• 2011-02-01 18:06:03: Alex created the details page Decklists
• 2011-02-01 17:40:46: Alex commented on Goblin Dirigible

  Hmm, thing about "Aircraft" is it'd include Thopter (and probably Floating Fortress) as well. Maybe I will go with Zeppelin after all, then.

• 2011-02-01 17:39:56: Alex commented on Sunderer of the Air

  Or I could always go the utterly bulletproof route with "its controller sacrifices it"... (Okay, that's not bulletproof against Darksteel Gargoyle plus Tajuru Preserver.)

• 2011-02-01 17:09:46: Chris commented on Sunderer of the Air

  You could protect against the Darksteel with the somewhat curious "Whenever a creature has flying, it loses flying UEOT. Destroy that creature."

  That, of course, allows effective regen. You may or may not care.

• 2011-02-01 17:03:51: Alex commented on Sunderer of the Air

  Could instead template like Suleiman's Legacy: "When ~ ETBs, destroy all creatures with flying. Whenever a creature with flying ETBs, destroy it." But that allows things to pick up flying equipment, for example. This way is less words and more loophole-proof: any time anything flies in any way, it dies. Regeneration only helps very briefly. The only drawback I can see is that this draws the game if there's a Darksteel Gargoyle around. (Well, and that the set is kinda themed around flyers, so this might be better deferred to set 2...)

• 2011-02-01 17:02:13: Alex created the card Sunderer of the Air
• 2011-02-01 17:01:29: Chris commented on Goblin Dirigible

  How about "Aircraft"?

• 2011-02-01 16:43:28: Jack V commented on Goblin Dirigible

  Although ship isn't an existing type anyway, and zeppelin is much more awesome...

  (Existing ship cards tend to be apparently -- pirates! Although I admit "artifact creature -- goblin pirate rigger zeppelin construct" would be too ridiculous :))

• 2011-02-01 15:42:21: Alex commented on Goblin Dirigible

  Changed type from Zeppelin to the slightly more generic Ship.

• 2011-02-01 15:42:01: Alex edited Goblin Dirigible
• 2011-02-01 15:41:57: Alex edited Long-Haul Blimp
• 2011-02-01 15:04:17: Alex commented on Gambler's Cruiser

  ­:) So do I, but I can't take credit for it. I think that's the current reminder text on "choose a card type" cards? ...Hmm, no, I'm wrong, Blood Oath and Vigean Intuition do mention tribal as well. Oh well, yes, it's more relevant my way.

• 2011-02-01 14:58:55: Chris commented on Gambler's Cruiser

  I approve of the inexhaustive, strictly correct, and almost-always (and certainly in set) maximally-relevant reminder text.

• 2011-02-01 14:52:34: Alex edited Gambler's Cruiser
• 2011-02-01 14:11:54: Alex edited Birthing Chamber
• 2011-02-01 13:57:53: Alex commented on Lofty Margravine

  Mmmm... On balance, I'd say Yes.

• 2011-02-01 13:57:26: Alex commented on Walking Gyromens

  It certainly makes Pestilence effects good, but so did Swans. It's a bit easier to cast in a mono-R or mono-B deck, but I think that's a fair evolution.

• 2011-02-01 13:12:51: Jack V commented on Walking Gyromens

  Too good with pyrohaemia? :)

• 2011-02-01 12:47:05: Chris commented on Lofty Margravine

  Is it wrong of me to read it as "Lofty Margarine"?

• 2011-02-01 12:01:59: Alex created the card Terrorcoil Gauntlets
• 2011-02-01 12:00:31: Alex commented on Walking Gyromens

  ­Swans of Bryn Argoll without the prevention. Too bad? Too boring?

• 2011-02-01 12:00:05: Alex edited Walking Gyromens
• 2011-02-01 11:59:06: Alex created the card Walking Gyromens
• 2011-02-01 11:58:27: Alex edited Gambler's Cruiser
• 2011-02-01 11:57:41: Alex edited Gambler's Cruiser
• 2011-02-01 11:57:25: Alex created the card Gambler's Cruiser