[H&V] Heroes & Villains: Recent Activity
| [H&V] Heroes & Villains: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Heroic Decks | Archenemy Deck |
Recent updates to [H&V] Heroes & Villains: (Generated at 2022-09-26 09:26:14)
Page 1 - Older activity
Page 1 - Older activity
Published as mtgnexus Card of the Day 2022-06-13.
Published as mtgnexus Card of the Day 2021-12-12.
https://www.mtgnexus.com/viewtopic.php?p=176013#p176013
Published as mtgnexus Card of the Day 2020-08-21.
Published as mtgnexus Card of the Day 2020-07-09.
Cycle for the Archenemies.
Cycle for the Archenemies.
Cycle for the Archenemies.
"Prevent all combat damage that attacking or blocking creatures would deal this turn.">>"Prevent all combat damage that would be dealt this turn."
fixed typo
I'm quite certain I make one Card of the Day each day. ;)
You do seem to make a lot of cards of the day; don't you? :)
Still; feels like a mighty fine stompy.
Published as mtgnexus Card of the Day 2019-09-09.
What I think you'd really want is "Discard a trap card: Draw a trap card". But doing that without it being either boring-repeatable card-search (and thus not very red, and certainly not common) or online-only is a hard thing. So this is probably a good-enough flavour implementation.
I wish there was a little more difference between the two abilities than just a 1 mana reduction. Something along the lines of "
, 
, discard a card: draw a card. If you discarded a trap card, also do X"
Published as mtgnexus Card of the Day 2019-09-01.
Rather wordy, but very nice design regardless. Quite interesting as a hybrid card.
Wait, why does it specify that attacking and blocking creatures don't deal combat damage this turn? What other entities would be dealing combat damage?
> "Prevent all combat damage that would be dealt this turn."
Tribal type is questionable.
Menace would fit here and could replace intimidate. (In that case) I would reduce the mana cost by
. Also, I think with menace the card could give +2/+2 UEOT instead.
Cool design mechanically as Trap cards generally tend to be by their very nature situational. Also has decent flavor.
agree with Vitenka about wording. I don't super mind about the flying thing, it would be neat, but it's your card... Also it doesn't need to be that specific imo.
Also it makes a lot more sense that an archer would at LEAST hit FIRST, but clear shot makes way more sense to me than the ixalan boi.
Sniper being even-firstier-strike-than-that seems a fine flavour to me.
And black sure gets "ETB: -1/1 counter". So that's fine. That this can be used pure-green is a lot less so. If it could shoot fliers only I'd be happier.
Or as noted, wording it as a one-sided-fight would keep flavour for green while being mechanically identical in 99% of cases. So "deals its power" rather than "deals 1"?
Seems fine to me. There's room for both styles of Archer.
So there is an Archer already that fights in a rather not one-sided fashion. Yet I feel Clear Shot has a better feeling for ranged combat.
Opinions?
Fighting would be the most likely implementation.
Maybe it could fight instead? Ala Atzocan Archer.
Collorbendy creature for the Archer deck.