Multiverse: New Mirrodin: Recent Activity

2012-03-25 04:22:51: jmgariepy edited Kinetic Orbit

2012-03-25 04:22:37: jmgariepy created the card Disruptive Orbit

2012-03-25 04:20:50: jmgariepy edited Kinetic Orbit

2012-03-25 04:20:22: jmgariepy edited Kinetic Orbit

2012-03-25 04:20:10: jmgariepy created the card Kinetic Orbit

2012-03-24 06:22:06: jmgariepy commented on Reflexive Orbit

This seems like a good place to put a cycle, but it has this little problem of "If I only ever have one of these (or maybe a blue one as well) in my deck, this seems like an unnecessary exercise). I think I'm getting around this by making the card better with each successive casting... so if your deck packs 4 of this card, it still makes sense to track where the counters are going. Kind of like how Aether Flame gets better and better. Still kind of bugs me, though. Wizards doesn't like it when this happens. Any players have a real problem with it?

2012-03-24 06:20:31: jmgariepy edited Reflexive Orbit

2012-03-24 06:17:57: jmgariepy created the card Reflexive Orbit

2012-03-22 05:53:47: jmgariepy commented on Bestial Acts

Nope. Nice try, but it's older than that.

Though, now that I look at it, I seem to have thrown you off by naming my main villain "Atticus". He's no Finch, though.

2012-03-22 05:35:29: dude1818 commented on Bestial Acts

Is that from To Kill a Mocking Bird? The name sounds familiar.

2012-03-22 04:28:15: jmgariepy commented on Bestial Acts

Super bonus points for anyone who recognizes the name/flavor text.

So what card would you prefer? A Sorcery that makes one player lose 3, gain 3, or a sorcery that makes all opponents lose 2 and you gain 2 per opponent? Seems like this is a straight-up litmus of "Do you prefer multi-player?", though, I do admit, this has a higher chance of seeing constructed play if you normally play with 7 people...

2012-03-22 04:25:19: jmgariepy created the card Bestial Acts

2012-03-22 04:17:32: jmgariepy commented on Renewed Vows

When looking for effects that I would like to repeat throughout the game, I figured Abeyance / Cease-fire] worked nicely. Thought about making this a tax of {2} ... but I guess that card would cost {w} ? And I probably wouldn't have the flavor text space? Oh well.

2012-03-22 04:14:16: jmgariepy created the card Renewed Vows

2012-03-22 04:11:55: jmgariepy edited Sojfa, Leonin Prioress

2012-03-22 04:05:07: jmgariepy created the card Ibok's Toolbox

2012-03-18 14:09:55: Alex commented on Recurring Theme

Heh. Indeed nice. Reminiscent of Think Twice.

2012-03-18 13:04:10: jmgariepy created the card Improvised Assault

2012-03-18 07:25:46: jmgariepy edited a mechanic in New Mirrodin

2012-03-18 07:24:08: jmgariepy created the card Break Down

2012-03-18 06:02:27: jmgariepy commented on Neodymium Sentinel

Evidently it does. Though, for the life of me, I have no idea why "each turn" is necessary. I gave homage to the templating gods and edited it anyway.

2012-03-18 06:01:39: jmgariepy edited Neodymium Sentinel

2012-03-17 18:19:18: Link commented on Neodymium Sentinel

Shouldn't it say "blocks each turn" if able?

2012-03-17 14:35:12: jmgariepy commented on Recurring Theme

For notes on Salvage, see (((Do Over))). This is a pretty snazzy Inspiration variant, if you ask me...

2012-03-17 14:34:13: jmgariepy created the card Recurring Theme

2012-03-17 14:24:52: jmgariepy edited a mechanic in New Mirrodin

2012-03-17 14:23:31: jmgariepy edited Recycled Magic

2012-03-17 14:23:05: jmgariepy edited a mechanic in New Mirrodin

2012-03-17 14:21:47: jmgariepy edited Recycled Magic

2012-03-17 14:20:31: jmgariepy created a mechanic in New Mirrodin