Pyrulea: Recent Activity

Pyrulea: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

Mechanics | More Detail on The Set | Skeleton | Color Archetypes | Creative/World Building | Cycles

Recent updates to Pyrulea: (Generated at 2025-05-02 10:24:00)

• 2016-10-12 04:45:14: DJK3654 commented on Downfall

  Uncommon and rare is the place for that.

• 2016-10-12 04:44:35: DJK3654 commented on Wild Conjuration

  I think we should leave it for now, we can figure it out through testing. We should focus on the set at a larger scale right now, I reckon.

• 2016-10-12 04:43:54: Brainpolice commented on Downfall

  Well, it definitely fills the "meh common kill spell" slot. :P Fair enough. I'd like to see what we can do for a more competitive land destruction slot or two.

• 2016-10-12 04:38:41: DJK3654 commented on Downfall

  We want to just throw multicolor around. I'm on board with this set being more multicolored in direction than the average with the general land theme and Discovery in particular, but this isn't a multicolor set.

  I designed this as an interesting variation for the meh black kill spell at common slot, namely because we have lands that become quite powerful through DFC transformation.

• 2016-10-12 04:36:42: Brainpolice commented on Wild Conjuration

  The fact that it does end up being a french vanilla that potentially grows a little more than its cost would normally justify makes me feel like it's still kind of a weak rare even in this form. The trample does help though. But there are plenty of cards that are uncommons that can give me a bigger creature quicker.

• 2016-10-12 04:32:54: DJK3654 commented on Wild Conjuration

  "Unless you mean to say that it can't get much bigger than 5/5 in terms of what you expect a quick, competitive game of PvP MTG to go like. That makes sense."

  That's what I mean. This naturally takes time and effort to build up, and it simply becomes a bigger french vanilla for it, so it doesn't really seem dangerous.

• 2016-10-12 04:31:49: Brainpolice commented on Downfall

  Serves a function at common. Boy does this make me miss the days of more liberally costed land destruction though. I immediately think of Pillage, which destroyed an artifact or land for 1RR at uncommon. Part of me wishes the cost of this was reduced by 1. Maybe 2BR?

• 2016-10-12 04:27:36: DJK3654 created the card Downfall
• 2016-10-12 04:27:20: Brainpolice commented on Wild Conjuration

  Yea I can see it being fine.

  One assumption of yours is throwing me off though. Discovery doesn't just refer to basic lands, it refers to any lands with different names. While multicolor naturally benefits a little more than monocolor with Discovery, it's not really dependent on it.

  Unless you mean to say that it can't get much bigger than 5/5 in terms of what you expect a quick, competitive game of PvP MTG to go like. That makes sense. The amount of likely turns expands out more in multiplayer environments.

• 2016-10-12 04:23:19: DJK3654 edited Card73360:

  Corrected wording 'to'->'onto'

• 2016-10-12 04:22:47: DJK3654 edited Card73360:

  Corrected wording 'return'->'put'

• 2016-10-12 04:17:51: DJK3654 commented on Card73502

  Cycling isn't supposed to be a very good deal. It's the opportunity value of being able to exchange your cards away if you don't want them at the moment. Maybe +2/+0 would be appropriate here, but +3/+0 is over the line. Expedite is a thing, and it doesn't have a creature you can play instead.

• 2016-10-12 04:17:30: Brainpolice edited Awaken Terrain:

  Had the colors in the mana cost reversed for some dumb reason.

• 2016-10-12 04:15:55: TRicher edited Unseen Servant
• 2016-10-12 04:14:38: TRicher created the card Unseen Servant
• 2016-10-12 04:13:19: DJK3654 commented on Wild Conjuration

  "We might have to consider upping the cost to 4 though." I don't think so. It has no immediate impact or protection still, and it can't get much bigger than 5/5. I think it's quite fair at the moment.

• 2016-10-12 04:04:06: TRicher edited Unbound Explorer:

  shifted to green and added untapping creatures

• 2016-10-12 04:02:54: TRicher edited Card73501:

  Added Scry 1

• 2016-10-12 04:02:15: TRicher commented on Card73502

  increased the power boost as well because I feel that paying for +1/+0 and haste is pretty weak

• 2016-10-12 04:01:33: TRicher edited Card73502:

  Increased cycling cost to and power boost to +3/+0

• 2016-10-12 03:57:42: TRicher edited Vampiric Bargain:

  Change from 'you' to 'target player'

• 2016-10-12 03:55:40: TRicher edited Vampiric Bargain:

  changed discovery threshold form six to three

• 2016-10-12 03:55:18: Brainpolice edited Wild Conjuration:

  Changed it to have P/T equal to your discovery, as adding a fixed amount of +1/+1 counters makes it a weak rare until the late game. We might have to consider upping the cost to 4 though.

• 2016-10-12 03:53:46: DJK3654 commented on Card73502

  Most base cycling cards are costed at M or , so I reckon this should cost .

• 2016-10-12 03:52:49: TRicher edited Card73502
• 2016-10-12 03:52:30: DJK3654 commented on Card73501

  Compare to Opt

• 2016-10-12 03:52:09: TRicher created and commented on the card Card73502

  Might be a bit pushed. is +1/+0, haste and a cantrip worth ? +3/+0 with haste is worth So it might be

• 2016-10-12 03:52:03: DJK3654 commented on Card73501

  I reckon this could scry 1 first.

• 2016-10-12 03:51:33: DJK3654 edited Card73501:

  Corrected wording 'tap 2 creatures'->'tap two untapped creatures'

• 2016-10-12 03:50:22: DJK3654 edited Card73492:

  '+5/+3'->'+5/+2'