Mirroria: Recent Activity
Mirroria: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Additions to Comp Rules | Style Guide | Art Descriptions |
Recent updates to Mirroria: (Generated at 2024-05-17 00:52:59)
Mirroria: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Additions to Comp Rules | Style Guide | Art Descriptions |
Recent updates to Mirroria: (Generated at 2024-05-17 00:52:59)
Hmmmm. While this is clearly a reference to Fire // Ice, I have to say I think I prefer the Fire//Ice way of doing it.
This was originally a straight-up +3/+0 and +0/+3 à la Archangel of Strife, but since it used counters, I figured why not make it proliferate friendly?
@cmeister2 I believe that's correct. That's the intent, anyway.
@jmgariepy That would be bad, because it would revert when it changed zones. Fixed that.
Also, I suppose this Transforms in your hand as opposed to on the stack? Because it will transform when you pay the cost, and, officially, the card won't be on the stack yet... that's the last step of casting a spell.
Just to check: if you transform it by paying , you stop processing the rest of Brimstone and continue processing Hailstone, correct?
Hmm. True. I'll agree I'd like to see it in action. I do love Equipment that turn into creatures (I enjoyed Ensouled Scimitar), so I'd like to see this work.
Amusing quirk: If the defending player uses Harm's Way to redirect 2 of the attacking damage from herself to some other player such as you, then this will simultaneously deal combat damage to 2 players, which will mean its ability will trigger twice: it'll transform to the Equipment, and then immediately transform back into the creature.
There's also something to be said about the number of ways you can kill this thing. Shatter, Doom Blade, Shock and Plummet will all knock it off the board, a number of Icy Manipulator style tricks, and it can't activate on the turn it deals combat damage to a player (barring Twiddle effects). It looks strong to me, too... but so doesn't Lightning Crafter (comparisons of uncommon to rare aside), and that card never "made it".
I'm just saying, I'd like to see this card in action. It's possible that there's enough workarounds to make this on par with Arbalast in power level.
It's not VERY repeatable. But they do need a spider to stop it being so. And even then it's 4 to use the second time.
It's nasty. It's very big, and it scares me. If it hits the table, I'll prioritise killing it.
But it's probably not completely unfair. Being colourless though, everyone will run it which might get a bit annoying.
Amusingly, if both I and my opponent have one, neither of us dare use it, because the other will shoot the resulting spirit.
Yikes. A repeatable creature-ping for 3?! Taking the 3/1-flying-lifelink-for-all-colours into consideration, this would be good enough if it just pinged for 1. The flavour is fractionally worse, but... pinging creatures for 3 repeatably is a board-dominating effect. Look at the hoops that Heavy Arbalest made people jump through.
Trying for the same kind of feel as Sleeper Agent. I suspect the "Backstabber" should be rather larger to make up for the extreme low cost at the moment. Also, this scares me at common: not just for the complexity but for the potential to have three or four of them on the board at once.
Um, wow. Making the "You take this" cost be coloured is pretty evil, as is the huge damage - even the stuff loss is pretty bad; and opponents won't always have both a creature and an artifact.
I suspect this is a bit too good for right now.
That's awesome!
Should this card start with "As long as ~ is on the battlefield"? I know it won't transform when it goes to the graveyard, and you know that, but I'd think that a goodly number of people would think that the point of this card is to Zombify a 3/3 Soldier Lord onto the battlefield...
Well. This is basically very close to a port of Bushi Tenderfoot to transform format. It'd just need double strike (and "attacks"->"becomes blocked") to make the port more accurate. Given which, double strike is a lot stronger than vigilance, so yes, I guess you could make this a lord if you wanted.