Multiverse Feedback: Recent Activity
| Multiverse Feedback: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Upcoming releases | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Multiverse Feedback: (Generated at 2025-05-12 20:08:49)
That's a good idea.
makes sense.
Would it make sense to add one or two placeholder images that people can use, like they often do with
, just because it's probably a lot easier? I agree custom mana costs would be fun long-term, but probably needn't be top priority.
Ah, that's a sensible idea.
I don't think I need an 'easier to find from everywhere' link, but something on the home page mentioning it (maybe alongside the 'recent improvements' as 'requested improvements'?) would be nice.
The route to this set that people are meant to use is clicking the "Feedback" link that's at the bottom of every single page. That page has direct links to "Create a bug" and "Create an enhancement request" as well as the list of all issues.
I could change the link name from "Feedback" to "Bugs and Enhancements" if that'd be much better, though I don't really like having a website shout about the possibility of bugs in it on every page.
Something I've considered is making it that the mouseover hover of a card shows something about the comments on it. Alternatively, I could easily make the skeleton include the number of comments and a bit of the last comment.
Really this is just a request for a view of the best bits of the skeleton and cardlist, smooshed together.
He (or she, no one knows) has a fondness for the term "on balance," which you also use. Just a tiny connection. lol
LOL. No, but it looks interesting now I google it. WHy doyou ask?
Jack V, this is completely random, but have you ever read anything by K. J. Parker?
Although, doh, I'd forgotten it was already an option -- probably most cardsets should have already been "edit by signed in users anyway" so it shouldn't make much difference to make it impossible, although on balance, I agree removing the option (or at least, making it clear it's a bad idea) is worthwhile.
Okay. The cardset option to allow edits by non-signed-in users will disappear in the next update.
Triple that notion. I have yet to get anything close to valuable input from someone who isn't logged in. I don't think we'd be missing much.
"Perhaps I should just remove the ability to edit cards anywhere if not signed in."
That's probably worthwhile. Even if anyone can sign up. I think comments and browsing by anonymous users is probably important, but I don't think I've seen anyone want to edit a card who wasn't already sufficiently committed to sign in.
restore
It's not a troll, it's a spammer. They do some test edits that don't contain URLs, which are accepted; then they try to post their spam links. The spam links get rejected by the anti-spam stuff I put in, but the junk/test edits do succeed. Perhaps I should just remove the ability to edit cards anywhere if not signed in.
OAuth painful to implement unless you're fitting precisely into the structure they expect.
In addition, federated identity is not something I like. Two thumbs down from me.
You have more ufseul info than the British had colonies pre-WWII.
Very valid, pithy, sucicnct, and on point. WD.
Haha, shouldn't you be chairgng for that kind of knowledge?!