Sienira's Facets: Recent Activity
| Sienira's Facets: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | The Facets Of Sienira | Keyword Mechanics | FAQ |
Recent updates to Sienira's Facets: (Generated at 2025-05-04 07:31:47)
Me neither. (I have endless trouble spelling 'Seinira' though...)
I wanted both the sorcery colours to have some sorcery at common that was a potential win condition, while still being common and not stupid-strong.
Me neither. (I have endless trouble spelling 'Seinira' though...)
No, I mean exile a creature card, then when someone casts a spell the right size, make it an instant so that I can bring it out.
Jenesis points out that this Just Doesn't Work on creatures with characteristic-defining abilities like Tarmogoyf. I really like the simplicity of the current wording, but I fear that if this card were to work, it'd have to read "and becomes an X/Y where X is its power and Y is its toughness", or something similarly horrible. I'd love to hear other suggestions from anyone who knows their Comp Rules, though.
No, I mean exile a creature card, then when someone casts a spell the right size, make it an instant so that I can bring it out.
Elvish Branchbender suggests:
"Enchanted permanent is an X/X creature in addition to its other types, where X is its CMC"
Elvish Branchbender suggests:
"Enchanted permanent is an X/X creature in addition to its other types, where X is its CMC"
i learned with my set (in progress) that players like bonuses more than penalties, even if they read the same. i would make it 2UU with As you cast ~, you may reveal an artifact and/or an instant card from your hand. for each card revealed this way, ~ costs less to cast.
Yeah... well, it makes me smile at least :) I guess Wizards probably wouldn't want to print it because of the amount of time Sensei's Divining Top took, but.
Heh, yeah, the name is not very good, is it? I should have a go at finding a better one. Good catch - it's essentially got no drawback on a defensive creature. I should probably make that "attacks or blocks".
Heh, yeah, the name is not very good, is it? I should have a go at finding a better one. Good catch - it's essentially got no drawback on a defensive creature. I should probably make that "attacks or blocks".
1) Cast Mirror of Foresight for ~50. 2) Activate Mirror of Foresight every turn. 3) Opponent concedes from boredom or the clock running out. Profit!
Heh, yeah, the name is not very good, is it? I should have a go at finding a better one. Good catch - it's essentially got no drawback on a defensive creature. I should probably make that "attacks or blocks".
Heh, yeah, the name is not very good, is it? I should have a go at finding a better one. Good catch - it's essentially got no drawback on a defensive creature. I should probably make that "attacks or blocks".
It lets you functionally steal opponents equipment...
It lets you functionally steal opponents equipment...
Can't be rare, as it's in the uncommon hoser cycle: red hating on the white-blue card type, artifacts. I don't think I like it as a rare at any cost, either. But yeah, I guess I'll up the cost a bit.
It lets you functionally steal opponents equipment...
It lets you functionally steal opponents equipment...
Seems a touch undercosted for a three-for-one. Shatterstorm is two whole mana more, rare, and a sorcery (the ability to kill more opponent's things is offset by the fact that it kills your things as well, and how many decks will have more than three artifacts in play at once anyway?); I'd either make it a 2RR instant at uncommon, or a RRR sorcery at rare.