| Infinite Potential Well: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Planets and Gravity | Merge Gates | Madness | Venture into the House |
|
CardName: Til Death Do Us Part Cost: 1w Type: Enchantment - Aura Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: Enchant two creatures you control If damage would be dealt to one of the enchanted creatures, you may have any amount of that damage dealt to the other enchanted creature instead. When one of the enchanted creatures dies, sacrifice the other. Disturb {4}{w} (You may cast this card from your graveyard transformed for its disturb cost.) Flavour Text: Back side: CardName: Spirit Spouse Cost: Type: Creature - Spirit Pow/Tgh: 1/1 Rules Text: Flying If Spirit Spouse would be put into a graveyard from anywhere, exile it instead. When Spirit Spouse enters, return target creature from your graveyard to the battlefield. It's a 1/1 white Spirit and has flying and "If this creature would be put into a graveyard from anywhere, exile it instead." Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Infinite Potential Well Rare
Til Death Do Us Part
  Enchant two creatures you control
If damage would be dealt to one of the enchanted creatures, you may have any amount of that damage dealt to the other enchanted creature instead. When one of the enchanted creatures dies, sacrifice the other. Disturb  (You may cast this card from your graveyard transformed for its disturb cost.)
R
Creature – Spirit
Flying
If Spirit Spouse would be put into a graveyard from anywhere, exile it instead. When Spirit Spouse enters, return target creature from your graveyard to the battlefield. It's a 1/1 white Spirit and has flying and "If this creature would be put into a graveyard from anywhere, exile it instead." 1/1
|
History: [-] Add your comments: |
Don't you hate when a simple idea ends up taking a billion words to explain? I already took a shortcut with Soulmates technology. The back face of cards with disturb should just have a "disturbed" keyword, rather than spelling out the exile clause each time
Also, 10 points to whomever gets the meme reference that inspired the card
Is this supposed to say "enchant two creatures you control"? Otherwise I'm confused about the sarifice clause. You cannot sacrifice the permanents of other players.
There is a flavor disconnect since actually death does not part them - well, except if you consider that one of them is not actually hanging out with the Spirit of their partner, but the spirit of their marriage...
I think it is weird that only one spouse returns as a Spirit of themselfa nd the other just becomes a blank virtual blank vanilla without hints of their former identity.
Now that I think about it... the returned creature doesn't even need to be part of the original marriage either...
I suppose I could have made this an aftermath spell that returned two creatures, but I started with the idea of a noncreature with disturb. The flavor needs art to emphasize that it's the same two characters on both sides, even if mechanically you use different creature cards each time
I think the problemis that you want todo the "two creature" part and the "noncreature with disturb" in one card design, while each idea individually seems easier.