Infinite Potential Well: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity
Mechanics | Planets and Gravity | Merge Gates | Madness

CardName: Hidden Pit Trap Cost: Type: Artifact - Hazard Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: Prime {u} (You may cast this card face down as a Hazard artifact for {2}. You may turn it face up for its prime cost as long as the trigger condition is met.) Trigger -- A creature without flying is attacking. When Hidden Pit Trap is turned face up, tap the triggering creature and remove it from combat. It doesn't untap during its controller's next untap step. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Infinite Potential Well Common

Hidden Pit Trap
 
 C 
Artifact – Hazard
Prime {u} (You may cast this card face down as a Hazard artifact for {2}. You may turn it face up for its prime cost as long as the trigger condition is met.)
Trigger — A creature without flying is attacking.
When Hidden Pit Trap is turned face up, tap the triggering creature and remove it from combat. It doesn't untap during its controller's next untap step.
Illus. Lucas Staniec
Updated on 20 Aug 2021 by dude1818

History: [-]

2020-07-09 16:28:57: dude1818 created and commented on the card Hidden Pit Trap
2020-07-09 16:29:24: dude1818 edited Hidden Pit Trap:

art

2020-07-09 17:00:56: dude1818 edited Hidden Pit Trap

That's a lot of hoops and mana for Take into Custody.

2021-08-19 13:47:03: dude1818 edited Hidden Pit Trap

It's marginally better because it also removes the creature from combat. Also, it leaves behind an artifact that can be used for stuff

Costing {2} more to prime only working on attacking creatures without flying is not exactly better. I bet you could get "Remove target attacking creature withoutflying from combat and tap it. It doesn't untap during its controller's next untap step." for a single mana and get "Draw a card." thrown in, too.

Howoften is removing the creature from combat really your bigger concern during deck bulding if Take into Custody can just tap even fliers before they attack?


Major concern that I didn't even notice because it's so bad: You are using "trigger" to refer to astati condition and "the triggering creature" is neither triggering any ability, nor is it any one well-defined creature. What is "the triggering creature" if there are two creatures with flying attacking? The text on the card certainly is not enough to figure that out.

This is definitely one of the weakest hazards, but that's fine. They can't all be good.

How the mechanic works is very straightforward. The triggering creature is the one that meets the condition in the trigger ability. If there are multiple, just pick one.

Add your comments:


(formatting help)
Enter mana symbols like this: {2}{U}{U/R}{PR}, {T} becomes {2}{u}{u/r}{pr}, {t}
You can use Markdown such as _italic_, **bold**, ## headings ##
Link to [[[Official Magic card]]] or (((Card in Multiverse)))
Include [[image of official card]] or ((image or mockup of card in Multiverse))
Make hyperlinks like this: [text to show](destination url)
How much damage does this card deal? Searing Wind
(Signed-in users don't get captchas and can edit their comments)