Multiverse Design Challenge: Recent Activity

Multiverse Design Challenge: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

All challenges | Upcoming Challenges | Make a new design challenge! | All challenges (text)

Recent updates to Multiverse Design Challenge: (Generated at 2025-05-18 17:25:29)

• 2012-01-30 09:43:27: Vitenka commented on Challenge # 027

  Hmmm... this is ebil; since all the colours share some overlap. Easiest way is probably just to slap a bigass pile of keywords; or use the horrible "If U was used to pay for this, then.." formula. Will have a thinky.

  ­Deathstalker Scorpion and Ing Charm

• 2012-01-30 09:42:41: jmgariepy commented on Challenge # 027

  Oddly, I had a game plan for when I needed to make 4 color cards. My plan was originally for cards colored , but I can adapt. The non-creature spell will probably be trickier, since I didn't have anything planned, but until I design that, enjoy Community.

• 2012-01-30 09:41:13: jmgariepy commented on Community

  For Challenge # 027. Four color cards? I had a game plan for those if I ever did them, seeing how Wizards botched in Guildpact. My plan was to focus on what the card wasn't, in this case, the creature isn't black. It's an incarnation of the one thing that the other colors can do that black abhors: trust. The two abilities could probably be a tad more on target, but I like the general idea.

• 2012-01-30 09:38:16: Alex commented on Selkie Soulbreather

  Created for Challenge # 027. I don't feel it's particularly inspired. At least it's two enemy-colour pairs, which feels a bit more satisfying than an utter mishmash.

• 2012-01-30 09:37:14: jmgariepy created the card Community
• 2012-01-30 09:35:50: Alex created the card Selkie Soulbreather
• 2012-01-30 07:39:02: Alex commented on Adept Vanguard

  Hmm. Yes, clever.

• 2012-01-30 04:29:37: Link edited Soul Slash:

  Changed rarity.

• 2012-01-30 04:28:18: Link commented on Soul Slash

  For Challenge # 027.
  I'm not sure this quite succeeds. For me, it's a hard sell as a or a card, though I think it's almost possible. I was going to have it deal 1 damage and gain 1 life, but there's no way that can be .

• 2012-01-30 04:26:41: Link edited Soul Slash:

  Fixed a typo.

• 2012-01-30 04:26:30: Link created the card Soul Slash
• 2012-01-30 04:00:48: Link commented on Challenge # 027

  I created Adept Vanguard and Soul Slash.

• 2012-01-30 04:00:23: Link edited Adept Vanguard:

  Changed name.

• 2012-01-30 03:58:45: Link commented on Adept Vanguard

  For Challenge # 027.
  Either green or white can provide vigilance, and I think the ability could almost occur in any of these colors. It's possible it should cost instead.

• 2012-01-30 03:57:10: Link created the card Adept Vanguard
• 2012-01-30 03:08:05: Link commented on Challenge # 027

  It could also potentially cost , I suppose.

• 2012-01-30 03:00:05: Link commented on Challenge # 027

  That is, a spell that costs , or . A creature costing , for example, should make sense as a creature, a creature, a creature, and a creature simultaneously.

• 2012-01-30 02:59:13: Link created the card Challenge # 027
• 2012-01-29 06:42:22: jmgariepy commented on Upcoming Challenges Discussion

  Sounds fine by me. Someone should poke me in a week afterwards if I don't add my challenge by then. I've got two floating in mind.

• 2012-01-28 22:18:58: Link commented on Upcoming Challenges Discussion

  I have another idea for a challenge, unless anyone objects.

• 2012-01-28 05:40:44: Link commented on Challenge # 026

  Go ahead.

• 2012-01-28 05:06:14: jmgariepy commented on Challenge # 026

  Good news. I'm going to start copying soon, and if anyone has a problem with me copying their specific card, I'll take it down.

• 2012-01-27 13:55:47: Vitenka commented on Challenge # 026

  Ditto, spread my evil scheme as widely as possible! Dance for me, puppet! :)

• 2012-01-27 12:55:56: Alex commented on Challenge # 026

  I have no objections to you copying my scheme.

  As the author of Multiverse, I would indeed encourage people to purchase the official Wizards Archenemy product. Wizards are pretty good to the community - after all, they allow fan-sites like this to exist even though we're using their copyrighted mana symbols and suchlike - so it's best to support them.

• 2012-01-27 12:47:26: Alex commented on My Ambition Never Ends

  No, they usually take action once then disappear. This wording is correct except for the capitalisation. "Until your next turn" seems to be more normal than "until the beginning of your next upkeep" but either would work. Wording examples.

• 2012-01-27 09:44:16: Vitenka commented on Varlan's Desire

  Yeah, revealing a card form a deck just means "I had to put a dead card in my deck" (and hey, if I DO get to 15 mana somehow...)

  Seems a shame.

• 2012-01-27 02:01:12: Link commented on Varlan's Desire

  I feel like this was too cheap before... but now maybe it costs too much. I don't know. It had CMC 4 before, but that just seemed too early to let someone put 15 +1/+1 counters on something by revealing Emrakul, the Aeons Torn.

• 2012-01-27 01:59:52: Link edited Varlan's Desire:

  Changed mana cost.

• 2012-01-26 09:24:19: Alex commented on Power From The Aether

  All the token-making schemes - 5/5 Dragon, 4/6 Golem, 5 Saprolings, and a 2/2 zombie for each opponent - are excellent turn 1 as well, yes.

• 2012-01-26 04:44:45: jmgariepy commented on Challenge # 026

  I was thinking of making an Archenemy set that was open to editing from the public so that people could contribute schemes. I'd also add the base schemes so that people could print up the cards and make a super-big archenemy stack out of them Achem! after buying the Archenemy product from Wizards and using the printed up cards as proxies Achem!

  I'd like to copy and paste these cards in that set, but I wouldn't want to do that if anyone have any objections. Any objections?