Multiverse Design Challenge: Recent Activity

Multiverse Design Challenge: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

All challenges | Upcoming Challenges | Make a new design challenge! | All challenges (text)

Recent updates to Multiverse Design Challenge: (Generated at 2025-05-19 03:23:35)

• 2012-02-16 11:16:30: jmgariepy commented on Upcoming Challenges Discussion

  Claiming the next challenge, which is technically number 29. Jack did 28.

  Also, when are we going to draft this set? The boosters for this thing is getting insane. I did a quick run, and, among other things, got a split card, two design challenges and an ongoing scheme.

• 2012-02-16 11:13:43: jmgariepy commented on Varlan the Grower

  I need to find a way to turn this guy into a creature, Fate Transfer his counters onto a Helix Pinnacle which I have also made a creature, then change the loyalty counters into Helix counters. It's been 18 years Magic! Why can't I do this incredibly complicated thing yet?

• 2012-02-16 10:58:31: cmeister2 commented on Varlan the Grower

  ­

  Loyalty 4
  T  A1  A2  Max
  1  5   4   5
  2  6   6   6
  3  7   8   8
  4  9   12  12
  5  13  20  20
  6  21  36  36
  7  37  68  68
  8  69  132 132
  ­

  Edit - bah, can't display tables :( but yeah, ultimate on T5 assuming no other loyalty lost.

• 2012-02-15 23:40:32: Link edited Varlan the Grower:

  Made wording modern? Weird that it wasn't. Also made him copy all creatures.

• 2012-02-10 10:51:07: Jack V commented on Philosopher's Stone

  "Artifacts you control are all colors. : Target creature you control is indestructable until end of turn"? :)

• 2012-02-10 10:19:54: jmgariepy commented on Philosopher's Stone

  I did think about doing something like:

  Put a Gold counter on target permanent.
  Permanents with gold counters on them are all colors.
  Permanents that are all colors gain "blah, blah, blah"...

  But, figured that in the end it was better to cut to the chase. I could see this as something that has only one purpose: to take all your stuff and paint it with the colors of the wind. While I would find that amusing, I assume other people would find that to be a rather useless Mythic Rare.

• 2012-02-10 09:59:41: Vitenka commented on Philosopher's Stone

  Might be slightly more subtle as "target permanent is all colours (this effect doesn't end)"

• 2012-02-10 09:50:52: Alex commented on Philosopher's Stone

  Yep, that's fine now.

• 2012-02-10 04:59:26: jmgariepy edited Philosopher's Stone
• 2012-02-10 04:59:17: jmgariepy commented on Philosopher's Stone

  Weird. I can still see it. Let's see what happens when I change the web address to a similar image.

• 2012-02-10 04:56:03: jmgariepy commented on Stirrup

  Hahahahahaha!

• 2012-02-10 04:54:32: jmgariepy commented on Peephole

  I don't see any reason why a card that helps get around shroud and hexproof shouldn't exist. It definately shouldn't be a 'mechanic', but a one-of answer to that super annoying card your opponent has? Sure, why not.

• 2012-02-10 04:52:53: jmgariepy commented on Haunted Castle

  Kind of funny. It reminds me more of an amusement park's version of a Haunted Castle. I run in there, and a cardboard cut out of a ghost pops up and smacks me in the face.

• 2012-02-09 19:29:36: Link commented on Astarael, the Sorrowful

  Yeah, I created it during a break during class on my Kindle and didn't have time to add that. Thanks. :)

• 2012-02-09 19:11:25: Alex commented on Astarael, the Sorrowful

  Created for Challenge # 028, I assume?

• 2012-02-09 17:39:01: Link created the card Astarael, the Sorrowful
• 2012-02-09 15:53:51: Jack V commented on Ranna, the Sleeper

  Yeah, it really, really feels like it should be, but it's not unique. In fact, I'm wrong to use the short name in the cost, I think, but it looks so much more natural like this.

• 2012-02-09 15:29:01: Link commented on Fire Tower

  That's exactly what it is. I've been playing a tower defense game with my friends a lot recently, and this sprang to mind.

• 2012-02-09 15:22:23: Link commented on Ranna, the Sleeper

  No, actually. There are multiple sets of bells, each with the same names.

• 2012-02-09 14:35:32: Alex commented on Ranna, the Sleeper

  Name suggests this should be legendary?

• 2012-02-09 14:34:26: Alex commented on Haunted Castle

  D'oh, so it does. You could say "It can't block any other creatures this combat", but that does draw attention to the problem rather than covering it up...

• 2012-02-09 14:33:20: Alex commented on Philosopher's Stone

  Heh. I can't see the image; opening it in its own tab yields " Forbidden. You don't have permission to access /blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/philo-stone.jpg on this server."

• 2012-02-09 14:32:15: Alex commented on Stirrup

  Yo dawg, I heard you like riding, so I put a horse on your horse so you can ride while you ride...

• 2012-02-09 14:30:03: Alex edited Magic Paintbrush
• 2012-02-09 14:29:53: Alex commented on Magic Paintbrush

  Oh, whoops, yes, they should have haste.

• 2012-02-09 14:29:36: Alex commented on Master Sword (LttP)

  Now that the (((C12345))) syntax is supported, there's not so much need to give cards anti-clashing names.

• 2012-02-09 13:57:05: Jack V commented on Challenge # 028

  Also, Haunted Castle and Peephole

• 2012-02-09 13:53:08: Jack V commented on Peephole

  A random hoser for shroud and hexproof probably shouldn't be printed, but I wasn't sure how I'd design a peephole, and then this popped into mind.

  I'd hoped to word the second ability better so it didn't rely on saying shroud or hexproof, but I thought it shouldn't bypass protection.

  Ideally the second ability would combo with the first, but I couldn't find a good way to let them be played in that order. I hesitantly let the first ability look at "any" player's library, as I felt it was odd that shroud would protect against the peephole.

• 2012-02-09 13:49:59: Jack V edited Peephole
• 2012-02-09 13:49:49: Jack V edited Peephole